регистрация / вход

Hamlet And Insanity Essay Research Paper I

Hamlet And Insanity Essay, Research Paper ?I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw? (2.2.338-9). This is a classic example of the ?wild and whirling

Hamlet And Insanity Essay, Research Paper

?I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from

a handsaw? (2.2.338-9). This is a classic example of the ?wild and whirling

words? (1.5.133) with which Hamlet hopes to persuade people to believe that he

is mad. These words, however, prove that beneath his ?antic disposition,?

Hamlet is very sane indeed. Hamlet is saying that he knows a hunting hawk from a

hunted ?handsaw? or heron in other words, that, very far form being mad, he

is perfectly capable of recognizing his enemies. Beneath his strange choice of

imagery involving points of the compass, the weather, and hunting birds, he is

announcing that he is calculatedly choosing the times when to appear mad. The

dictionary defines sanity as ?soundness of mind? and I will prove that

Hamlet is sane through many examples that show of his soundness of the mind.

Hamlet warned his friends he intended to fake madness, but Gertrude as well as

Claudius saw through it, and even the slightly dull-witted Polonius was

suspicious. His public face is one of insanity however, in his private moments

of soliloquy, through his confidences to Horatio, and in his careful plans of

action, we see that his madness is assumed. Samuel Johnson, a well respected

author , has ?no doubt that the hero?s ?madness??was merely ?pretended??(Neill,

309). After the Ghost?s first appearance to Hamlet, Hamlet decides that when

he finds it suitable or advantageous to him, he will put on a mask of madness so

to speak. He confides to Horatio that when he finds the occasion appropriate, he

will ?put an antic disposition on? (1.5.172). Mark Van Doren poins out in

his book ?Shakespeare,? that Hamlet?s ?antic disposition? is used

?as a device for seeming mad? (162). This strategy gives Hamlet a chance to

find proof of Claudius? guilt and to contemplate his revenge tactic. Although

he has sworn to avenge his father?s murder, he is not sure of the Ghost?s

origins: ?The spirit that I have seen / May be the devil? (2.2.541-2). He

uses his apparent madness as a delaying tactic to buy time in which to discover

whether the Ghost?s tale of murder is true and to decide how to handle the

situation. At the same time, he wants to appear unthreatening and harmless so

that people will divulge information to him, much in the same way that an adult

will talk about an important secret in the presence of a young child. To

convince everyone of his madness, Hamlet spends many hours walking back and

forth alone in the lobby, speaking those ?wild and whirling words? which

make little sense on the surface but in fact carry a meaningful subtext. When

asked if he recognizes Polonius, Hamlet promptly replies, ?Excellent well; you

are a fishmonger? (2.2.173). Although the response seems crazy since a

fish-seller would look completely unlike the expensively dressed lord Polonius,

Hamlet is actually criticizing Polonius for his management of Ophelia, since

?fishmonger? is Elizabethan slang for ?pimp.? He plays mind-games with

Polonius, getting him in crazy talk to agree first that a cloud looks like a

camel, then a weasel and finally a whale, and in a very sane aside, he then

comments that ?They fool me to the top of my bent? (3.2.337-8). Although he

appears to have lost touch with reality, he keeps reminding us that he is not at

all ?far gone, far gone? (2.2.186) as Polonius claims, but is in fact very

much in command of himself and the situation. With his rantings and ravings and

his seemingly useless pacing of the lobby, Hamlet manages to appear quite mad.

The na?ve and trusting Ophelia believes in and is devastated by what she sees

as his downfall: O, what a noble mind is here o?erthrown!

??????????? Th; expectancy and rose of the fair state

??????????? Th? observ?d of all observers, quite,

quite down!? (3.1.142-6). Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are also fully

convinced. They are Hamlet?s equals in age but are far inferior in intellect

and therefore do not understand that he is faking. However, although Hamlet

manages to convince these simple friends and Ophelia of his insanity, other

characters in the play such as Claudius, Gertrude, and even Polonius eventually

see through his behavior. Claudius is constantly on his guard because of his

guilty conscience and he therefore recognizes that Hamlet is faking. The king is

suspicious of Hamlet from the very beginning. He denies Hamlet permission to

return to university so that he can keep an eye on him close by. When Hamlet

starts acting strangely, Claudius gets all the more suspicious and sends

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to spy on him. Their instructions are to discover

why Hamlet is pretending to be mad: And can you, by no drift of conference, Get

from him why he puts on this confusion, Grating so harshly all his days of quiet

With turbulent and dangerous lunacy? (3.1.1-4) The reason Claudius is so

reluctant to believe that Ophelia?s rejection has caused Hamlet?s lunacy is

that he does not believe in his madness at all. When Claudius realizes through

the play-within-the-play that Hamlet knows the truth about his father?s death,

he immediately sends him away to England. The prevailing piece of evidence

demonstrating Claudius? knowledge of Hamlet?s sanity is the fact that he

feels threatened enough by Hamlet to order him killed by the king of England:

For like the hectic in my blood he rages, And thou must cure me: till I know

?tis done, Howe?er my haps, my joys were ne?er begun. (4.3.62-4) In the

scene in his mother?s bedroom, Hamlet tells Gertrude that his insanity is

assumed: It is not madness That I have utter?d: bring me to the test, And I

the matter will re-word, which madness Would gambol from. (3.4.142-5), Even

without his confirmation, the queen has seen through his act. While Hamlet is

reprimanding her, she is so upset that she describes his words as ?daggers?

(3.4.96) and claims, ?Thou hast cleft my heart in twain? (3.4.157). The

words of a madman could not have penetrated her soul to such an extent. The

queen takes every word Hamlet says seriously, proving she respects him and

believes his mind to be sound. Furthermore, she believes Hamlet?s confession

of sanity immediately. She does not question him at all but instead promises to

keep it her secret: Be thou assur?d, if words be made of breath, And breath of

life, I have no life to breathe What thou hast said to me. D.A. Traversi in his

?An Approach to Shakespeare,? points out that ?Hamlet?s concern with

action, upon which his dilemma is finally concentrated, is most fully developed,

immediately after his confrontation with his mother? (358). If hamlet was

truly insane, this is the scene where he would show it the most, however, he

proves to be very sane. Even Polonius can see that Hamlet has not completely

lost touch with the world. Although he frequently misses the meanings of

Hamlet?s remarks and insults, he does recognize that they make some sense.

After a confusing conversation with Hamlet he remarks, ? Though this be

madness, yet there is method in?t? (2.2.199). When his theory of rejected

love proves wrong, he becomes very suspicious of Hamlet?s behavior and offers

to test it by hiding behind the ?arras? in Gatorade?s bedroom so that he

can listen in on Hamlet?s private conversation with his mother. Polonius?s

suspicions about the legitimacy of Hamlet?s madness lead to his death when

Hamlet stabs the ?arras? in the mistaken belief that the eavesdropper is

Claudius. Hamlet?s soliloquies, his confidences to Horatio, and his elaborate

plans are by far the most convincing proof of his sanity. Throughout the play,

Hamlet?s soliloquies reveal his inner thoughts, which are completely rational.

In one such speech, Hamlet criticizes himself for not having yet taken action to

avenge his father?s murder: O what a rogue and peasant slave am I

??????????. That I, the son of the dear murder?d, Prompted

to my revenge by heaven and hell, Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words

(2. 2. 490-528). Hamlet calls himself a ?dull and muddy-mettled rascal?

(2.2.508), a villain and a coward, but when he realizes that his anger does not

achieve anything practical other than the unpacking of his heart, he stops.

These are not the thoughts of a madman; his emotions are real and his thoughts

are those of a rational man. Even when he contemplates suicide in the ?to be

or not to be? soliloquy, his reasons himself out of it through a very sane

consideration of the dangers of an unknown afterlife: ?And thus the native hue

of resolution / Is sicklied o?er with the pale cast of thought? (3.1. 84-5).

Orson Welles states in the book ?The Friendly Shakespeare,? ?I don?t

think any madman ever said, ?Why, what an ass am I,? I think that is a

devinely sane remark.?(350) A further important proof of his sanity is how

patiently he devises plans to prepare for his revenge. As he explains to

Horatio, his ?antic disposition? is a device to test his enemies. His

mounting of the play-within-the-play is another well-laid plan to trap Claudius

into admitting guilt: ?The play?s the thing / Wherein I?ll catch the

conscience of the king? (2.2.547-8). Even when the play brings him concrete

proof, he is careful not to rush to take his revenge at the wrong moment. He

could easily kill Claudius while he is praying, but restrains himself insuring

that there is no chance of Claudius entering heaven. Although Hamlet?s

patience can be seen as an example of his procrastination, I think that it is

rather a sign of rationality. Hamlet shows himself perfectly capable of action,

as well as of rational thought, in escaping the king?s armed guard,

dispatching Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their deaths in England, dealing

with the pirates and making it back to Denmark. The last conviction of

Hamlet?s sanity is the normality in his reactions to the people around him. He

is perfectly sane, friendly, and courteous with the players, giving them good

acting tips, which they appreciate and respect. When Polonius and Claudius test

the theory of rejected love by ?loosing? Ophelia to him, Hamlet acts

completely rationally. He greets Ophelia sweetly, gets a little cold when he

remembers that he has not seen her ?for this many a day,? is very hurt when

she returns his remembrances, and becomes completely furious, insulting

womankind in general, when she lies to him about her father?s whereabouts and

he realizes he is being spied on. He reacts in a way that any hurt young

rejected lover would. In the end, it is surprising that he is able to keep up

the charade of feigning madness for so long, and part of his tragedy is that it

doesn?t help him anyway; in the end, he avenges his father by killing Claudius

not through an act of madness, but as a result of Claudius? own treachery.

5a7

Epstein, Norrie. The Friendly Shakespeare. New York: Penguin Group, 1993.

Neill, Michael. Hamlet: A Modern Perspective. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of

Denmark. Ed. Barbra A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Washington Square

Press, 1992. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. The Compact Bedford Introduction to

Literature. 4ht ed. Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston: Bedford, 1997. 958-1052. Traversi,

D.A. An Approach To Shakespeare. 3rd ed. New York: Doubleday & Company,

1969. Van Doren, Mark. Shakespeare. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1939. New

Webster?s Dictionary. 1992 ed.

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий