Capitol Punishment Essay Research Paper Currently the

Capitol Punishment Essay, Research Paper

Currently, the United States is the only western democracy that still has

capital punishment on the books. Even South Africa has eliminated it. The United

States is left with such company as Libya, Iran, and Iraq. America, where

freedom and democracy are firmly entrenched, remains committed to this brutal

and dehumanizing form of punishment. The goal of the death penalty is revenge.

It is not a deterrence of crime, as the death penalty has been proven not to

deter crime. Capital punishment is nothing more than an outlet for the bloodlust

of the American people. Capital punishment is unjust, and it is not an effective

deterrent of crime. Does the government have the right to kill? A policeman

defending the safety of the public by firing on an armed and dangerous criminal

might have that right. Suppose we apply the same standards to the government

that we have for civilians. A civilian at home can legally shoot at an intruder,

but if the civilian catches the intruder, incapacitates him, and then shoots him

that act would be considered murder. That is what capital punishment is–murder.

Also, capital punishment is an unjust punishment. Currently, the death penalty

is divided along racial lines. In Georgia, a person accused of killing a white

person was 4.3 times more likely to be sentenced to death than a person accused

of killing a black person (Hood 25). Arkansas, Illinois, North Carolina, and

Mississippi showed similar statistics. Also, each year, only two percent of

death sentences are given to women. Since 1608, three percent of the 19,000

confirmed executions in the United States were women (Hood 37). Finally, the

death penalty does not deter crime. Proponents for the death penalty argue that

the death penalty deters violent crimes. Statistics show the opposite. The

United States is the only Western nation that still allows the death penalty,

and it still has one of the highest crime rates. In the 1980’s, the death

penalty states averaged an annual rate of 7.5 criminal homicides per 100,000

crimes while abolition states averaged a rate of 7.4 criminal homicides per

100,000 crimes (Greenberg 25). Murder was more common in states with the death

penalty. In a nationwide survey of police chiefs and sheriffs, capital

punishment was ranked last as a way of reducing crime (Greenberg 26). Also, the

theory behind the deterrence doctrine is flawed itself. Murderers do not examine

risk charts before they kill. Being criminal is inherently irrational. Life

imprisonment ought to deter a rational person. No criminal commits a crime

thinking that he will be caught. The death penalty is wrong, unfair, and is

proven not to deter crime. Coretta Scott King spoke out against the death

penalty saying that: As one whose husband and mother-in-law have died the

victims of murder assassination, I stand firmly and unequivocally opposed to the

death penalty for those convicted of capital offenses. An evil deed is not

redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the

tacking of a human life. Morality is never upheld by a legalized murder (Amnesty


Amnesty International Report. The Death Penalty. England: Amnesty

International Publications, 1979. Greenberg, Jack. Taking Sides. Boston: The

Dushkin Publishing Group, March 1995. Hood, Roger. The Death Penalty: A World

Wide Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, May 1989.


Все материалы в разделе "Иностранный язык"

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ  [можно без регистрации]
перед публикацией все комментарии рассматриваются модератором сайта - спам опубликован не будет

Ваше имя:


Хотите опубликовать свою статью или создать цикл из статей и лекций?
Это очень просто – нужна только регистрация на сайте.

Copyright © 2015-2018. All rigths reserved.