регистрация / вход

Death Penalty Essay Research Paper Persuasive

Death Penalty Essay, Research Paper Persuasive & Argumentative Essay: Capital Punishment Capital punishment is the only way to achieve true justice for felons convicted of horrendous crimes. Capital punishment in the past, people have invariably felt that if they had been wronged in some way, it was his or her right to take vengeance on the person that had wronged them.

Death Penalty Essay, Research Paper

Persuasive & Argumentative Essay: Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is the only way to achieve true justice for felons convicted of horrendous crimes. Capital punishment in the past, people have invariably felt that if they had been wronged in some way, it was his or her right to take vengeance on the person that had wronged them. This mentality still exists, even today, but in a lesser form because the law has now outlined a person’s rights and developed punishments that conform to those rights, yet allow for the retribution for their crime. Thus ,Capital punishment should be the penalty for criminals convicted or malicious and horrendous crimes.

However, some feel that those laws and punishments are too lax and criminals of today take advantage of them, i.e. organized crime. Knowing very well that the punishments for their crime, whether it is murder, theft, or any other number of criminal activities, will be so negligible that it may be well worth their risk. This leads to the reason that capital punishment should be legal in all states.

Amendments were made to reflect the changes in the society’s views on the morality of capital punishment. That resulted in the narrowing down of the list of one hundred crimes to twelve, punishable by the death penalty in 1833, and in 1869 it was cut down yet again to just three: treason, rape, and murder because of violent nature of these crimes. These crimes, even today, are still viewed as violent and should be punished with the highest degree of discipline available to achieve justice. After much public pressure, capital punishment was suspended on a trial run in 1967. This proved to be ineffective, because even though the law stipulated that crime such as treason or the murders of law enforcement agents were still to be subjected to the death penalty. The federal cabinet continued to commute those criminals from death to life sentences, hence the law was not being followed and justice was not being served. This soon was followed with capital punishment’s abolishment in 1976, as a formal declaration of what was already happening or rather what was not happening.

It is felt that because of this and the fact that there had not been an execution since 1967, that today’s current form of punishments are no longer a sufficient deterrent for such serious crimes and have contributed to an ever rising crime rate. So, this is where the real issue of whether or not capital punishment should exist begins and such a controversial issue could be best understood if we looked at capital punishment in a perspective of how it fulfils or does not fulfill society’s ideas of punishment. Is not one of the four fundamental objectives behind punishment retribution? The sentencing objective based on the principle of “an-eye-for-an-eye”, which means that what one person has done to another should also be done to that person in return. Is that not justified, especially in cases of premeditated murder of another human begin, another life? Does capital punishment not act as a deterrent? Does it not threaten with an imposition of a penalty for the commission of an act considered wrong by society? Does capital punishment remove criminals from society so that they cannot repeat their offence or commit other offences against society? Capital punishment follows the above three objectives. Most people would say it does. But then, of course, people who support the abolishment of capital punishment would ask about rehabilitation, the re-training of prisoners with an employable skill for use when they are released. Not only is it expensive to re-train and house criminals, but with some, it is just not possible, because they are hardened criminals and will not change. For those people, it is just not worth the effort and the taxpayers’ money to even attempt to reform them.

Also, another point to consider is that today prison terms are not enough. Many people are allowed out early on parole and/or remission resulting in criminals just serving one third of their prison terms and being released back into society. This type of quick release cannot adequately tribute someone’s death nor deter others strongly enough from repeating the same offence that the criminals already have. As you can see, capital punishment fulfils our society’s “checklist” of what a punishment should do especially the objective of retribution. Many who wanted capital punishment restored to all states, have also clearly stated that without a suitable punishments for crimes, justice will never truly be served to those that have suffered damages or losses. People will think less and less of the law and start resorting to “private law and order”. This would not only create chaos but also raise the crime rate further with people running around on private vendettas.

Even with these facts and arguments, the government refuses to restore the death penalty to all states. So all we can do now is protest to the government, wait, and hope that it will not take a high crime rate and the loss of many innocent lives.

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий