St. Anselm’S Ontological Argument For The Experience Of God. Essay, Research Paper
God’s existence may vary from philosopher to philosopher, but according to the late St. Anselm,
Archbishop of Canterbury there was absolutely no doubt that God’s presence is certain, and yet the
philosopher desires the understanding of faith. As stated; if god cannot be thought to exist, then
whomever which may be conceived, only a fool would believe that he God does not exist.
Only a fool says from his or her heart there is no God, was the largest idea discussed in the
presentation quoted by Anselm. It is one thing for an object to be in the understanding, and another
to understand that objects exist, he both, has it in has understanding and he understands that it exists
because he has made it. There is not a doubt that there exists a being, than which nothing greater
can be conceived. And it exists both in the understanding and in reality, then, so truly than a being
which nothing greater can be conceived to exist, our God? If a mind could conceive of a being
better then thee, the creature would rise above the Creator; and this is absurd. God can be
conceived to not exist; but in the later, not at all. For example, no one who understands what God
is can conceive that God does exist; God is that than which a greater cannot be conceived. The nonexistence of that than which a greater cannot be conceived is inconceivable.
Gaunilo’s argumentative criticism claims that in the dual existence, with understanding and in
reality, for this reason it must exist. For if it does not exist, any lord who really exists will be more
excellent than God. If man should try to prove to that his existence should no longer be doubted
and me by such reasoning that God exists, for he ought to show first that the hypothetical
excellence of God exists as a real and indubitable being or spirit, or one whose existence is uncertain in our understanding.
basic writings of st. aslemn