регистрация / вход

Evolution Essay Research Paper Evolution vs CreationEvolution

Evolution Essay, Research Paper Evolution vs. Creation Evolution versus Creationism is a hot topic that is in constant debate among scientists and Christians. Held in high regard to the world of science, Evolution, is the theory that groups of organisms change with passage of time, mainly as a result of natural selection, so that descendants differ morphologically and physiologically from their ancestors.

Evolution Essay, Research Paper

Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution versus Creationism is a hot topic that is in constant debate among scientists and Christians. Held in high regard to the world of science, Evolution, is the theory that groups of organisms change with passage of time, mainly as a result of natural selection, so that descendants differ morphologically and physiologically from their ancestors. On the other hand, faith of millions of Christians hold the truth that, the act of GOD by which the whole entire world was brought into existence is where the basis of everything in existence today came from. In regards to the two arguments above, my entire ballot is supporting the views and ideas of the Creation theory.

Evolution is a theory that is based on science and concrete evidence. Faith is in no way, shape, or form, a factor that influences the ideas and theories supported by Scientists. Faithless and blind, the world of science chooses to support a claim that is shattered by the faith of millions and millions of Christians. In my argument, there are several ideas that I have researched on the internet as to why evolution is an invalid theory, and is to be disregarded as the basis for such a fine genre of study, such a science.

Evolution is a process that cannot take place unless mutations that are random occur. In the instance of animal?s advanced mechanisms of defense, random mutation could not produce them. A specific beetle dubbed the ?bombardier beetle? possesses two chemical tanks in its body. Upon attacking the beetle, two different chemicals in the tanks are sprayed from the body. Combined in the air, a hot explosion is produced in the face of the predator. In light of evolution, when the initial mutations occurred and the tanks were just starting to form but were not yet able to function properly, they would serve no purpose to the beetle. Thousands of mutations, and millions of years would be need to produce the end result of the beetles defense, especially since the mechanism would not aide the animal in any survival advantage until it was fully developed. Plus, mutations are random and they never would be able to follow a pattern that would exhibit the end result of the beetle?s defense mechanism. Evolution simply does not work. Evolution would be comparable to copying a computer program over to a computer that would randomly change one byte during each copy process. You could copy the program a billion times but the result would only produce a program that does not function, not a program with added features.

Another point to be observed when taking consideration into the theory of evolution is the proposed idea of intermediate fossils. The basic problem is that, there are no intermediate fossils. If evolution were a theory that held truth, there would be numerous examples of animals, which are between the stages of development of different characteristics. For example, there is yet to be a discovery of a fossil that exhibits how wings developed. There is no fossil that objectifies a creature or animal that has a forelimb that is halfway between being an arm, and half way between being a leg. That is one more reason that nullifies the idea of evolution.

Another factor that does not support the idea of evolution is the factor of DNA. All observed mutations of DNA cause a loss of DNA information. All experiments in the laboratory that include DNA of mutated specimens always show a loss of DNA information. For evolution to truly take place there must be the addition of new data to the DNA chain, yet there has never been the case to this point. Oddly enough, many supporters of evolution always show animals that have lost some feature, de-evolution, and regard that as an example of evolution?

Closing my researched ideas falsifying evolution, it is shown that there are three major aspects alone, not including others, why evolution is not a valid theory of creation. Since mutations are random, they would never be able to follow a set pattern to achieve the end result of a set species. Intermediate fossils that would support the claim of evolving animals do not exist. Plus, DNA of species with mutations always shows a loss of DNA. Evolution is a theory that should not be blindly accepted with out extensive research. For the basis of science to be on concrete evidence and facts, they are lacking many of those aspects when it comes to the support of evolution.

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий