Смекни!
smekni.com

The Reign Of Terror Essay Research Paper (стр. 1 из 2)

The Reign Of Terror Essay, Research Paper

The Reign of Terror

History is said to be written by the winners, but is it possible to

rewrite history? In a way, the French, like many who have preceded them, and

many who will proceed them have done the impossible, rewriting history. From

trivial folklore, such as George Washington chopping down a cherry tree, to the

incredibly wrong, the African slave trade; people’s views of history can be

shaped and molded. The French have done a superb job of instilling all of us

with the concept that their Revolution was a fight for liberty, justice and the

good of all Frenchmen everywhere. Their glorification of the Bastille with it’s

depictions in painting and sculpture and how the Revolution was the beginning of

a new age pales to some of the events during this period. In fact, the storming

of the Bastille was merely a hole in the dike, and more would follow. The

National Guard, the Paris Commune, the September Massacre, are all words that

the French would prefer us not to hear. These events were a subtle d?nouementto

an climax that was filled with both blood and pain. The Reign of Terror, or the

Great Terror, was a massive culmination to the horror of the French Revolution,

the gutters flowing with blood as the people of Paris watched with an

entertained eye. No matter what the French may claim, if one chooses to open

his eyes and read about this tragedy, they are most certainly welcome.

The revolution begins quietly in the fiscal crisis of Louis XVI’s reign.

The government was running deeply into bankruptcy, and at the urging of his

financial advisors, he called the Estates General. The governing body had not

been called for almost two centuries, and now it’s workings seemed outdated. A

small number of people said that the Third Estate, that which was drawn from the

towns, should have power to equal the other Estates. Clubs of the bourgeoisie,

the middle class, were formed, proclaiming, “Salus populi lex est.” It was a

simple cry meaning “the welfare of the people is law.” To these people, the

Estates General was like a pair of shoes that no longer fit. Reformed seemed

iminent, the phrase, “The Third Estate is not an order, it is the nation itself”

began to circulate.1

With much fanfare and circumstance, the three estates were called

together. However, on trying to meet, the Third Estate found the doors to their

meeting place locked. Moving to the tennis court, with much deliberation, an

oath was sworn between the delegates and some clergy, proclaiming themselves as

the National Assembly. They swore to remain indivisible until a constitution

had been formed. As they met at the church of St. Louis, the King was delayed

in his attempt to end this display of independence. Finally, he informed them,

that he would not allow any reforms to be made, unless he approved of them.

Unfortunately, their will would not be easily undone, and in a vote to four

hundred ninety three to ninety four, the National Assembly declared that serious

action would be taken against the King. With such an resounding opposition, on

June 27th, 1789, Louis XVI gave into their demands.

Educated in Paris, a young man of twenty six years, would be one of the

first to set off the spark of revolution. Jumping on top of a table at the

Palais Royale, a social gathering place in Paris, he spoke out against the

enemies of the people in a well scripted oration. The crowd quickly fawned over

their new found hero, marching through the streets of Paris, even interrupting a

performance at the Paris opera. Military forces were required to remedy the

situation, yet Paris only had six thousand troops with which to defend itself

against the rampaging mob. At the Place Vendome, the cavalry attempted to

control the riot, only to find their horses surrounded and unmovable through the

dense crowd.

The officers of the Swiss and Turkish armies attacked the rioters

outright, but the garde-nationale was called in to stop this massacre. This

chaos caused the Hotel de Ville to demand each tocsin, or summoning bell, cannon,

drum, and church bell be used to summon the people of Paris. Drawing from the

electoral populace of each section, four thousand and eight hundred men were

given the task of protecting Paris, now named the Paris commune. They wore the

colors of red and blue, symbolizing the colors of Paris. Armed with cannons and

muskets, they had little powder with which to defend Paris.

The Bastille was a prison, built of stone, it had eight round towers,

with it’s highest tower being seventy-three feet. It was built as a defensive

fort against the British, and was not converted into a prison until under the

rule of Charles VI. To the authors, sculptors and painters who glorified the

taking of the Bastille, it was a dark and secret castle, where prisoners never

returned from. Each prisoner hung from shackles until their dried bones were

pushed into a corner, but the Bastille was nothing like that in reality. It was

a prison for nobility, clergy, the occasional scandalous author, and juvenile

delinquents whose parents had asked for them to be kept there. Most prisoners

had more money spent on them, then it took for an average Parisian to subsist.

The living quarters were octagonal rooms, sixteen feet in diameter. Pets were

allowed to deal with the vermin, and prisoners were allowed furnishings, clothes,

and other personal belongings. Even one of the most infamous criminals, the

demented Marquis de Sade, made his home their, receiving his wife and other

visitors on a regular basis.

With only a few prisoners, the Bastille was an ideal place to store

large amounts of ammunition. Bernard-Rene de Launay was in control of a force

of just over a hundred men that were given the task of defending more then

thirty-thousand pounds of powder. In the event of a siege, the Bastille would

not be able to hold out long, only containing a two day food supply, and no

internal water. The morning of July 14th, a large crowd of over eight hundred

people set before the Bastille, calling for it’s surrender. Delegates were sent

in to speak with de Launay, yet he refused to capitulate until orders from the

Hotel de Ville were presented to him.

As the orders were being fetched, the crowd grew less patient, until

finally a carriage-maker cut the lines of the drawbridge, allowing them access

to the inner courtyard. As shots were fired on both side, the siege became

imminent. For a day, desperate attempts on both sides finally ending in the

surrender of the guards. The guards were then rounded up, decapitated, and

their heads were paraded on pikes like the wax busts of French heroes. De

Launay was stabbed, rolled into a gutter, then shot before his head was taken as

a trophy. By the end of November of 1789, Palloy, a labor leader who had jumped

the gun to begin demolition, the crews of Palloy had nearly finished destruction

of the Bastille.

The church had become split over those who did or did not support the

revolution. The Papacy was on the side of the counter-revolutionaries, and

could not support the King’s signing of the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in

1791. The seasons since 1789 had been quiet, violence sporadic and viewed as

behind the new way of life in France. Unfortunately, the King did not

appreciate his stay in the Tuilleries, and in the summer of 1791, an escape

attempt was expected. The palace was surrounded with guards at every gate,

river front, and over six hundred national guardsmen watching every possible

escape route. Among the servants, a few were informants, and leaving the royal

quarters required a pass.

An extremely generous young cavalier, Count von Fersen, was willing to

do anything to assist the King and Queen, and so on the night of June 20, 1791,

they made their escape. They made it out of the palace, disguised, and made it

as far as the town of Varennes in the north east. The ride back to Paris was an

ordeal, followed by a mob and the National Guard.

Riots began occurring in Paris, as the sans cullotes, or the poor of

Paris, sued for their rights. Some sides wished for the king’s freedoms, while

the left sought to radicalize the revolution even further. The journalists

Jacque Hebert and Jean-Paul Marat, they wrote the journals, Le pere Duchesne,

and L’Ami du Peuple, respectively. Their attacks on established French

Institutions were biting with much venom in their arguments. Marat suffered

from a strange skin disease that gave him horrible lesions that reeked and

sickened those that were around him. Of the two, he was the more violent

insisting that, “Let the blood of the traitor’s flow. That is the only way to

save the country.”

In June of 1791, as the King attempted escape from the Tuilleries, the

sans culottes armed themselves. Holding aloft a calf’s heart they claimed to be

the heart of an aristocrat, they found Louis, forcing him to wear a liberty cap

and drink with them. As the weeks past, in the early days of August, the

National Assembly declared that Paris would become the Insurrectionary Commune.

They removed the royalists from any positions of power, along with replacing

lawyers with artisans, and on August the 9th, they began their normal

deliberations. A huge crowd of twenty thousand sans cullotes called for the

King and Queen who had taken refuge with the National Assembly. A crowd broke

through the gates, demanding that liberty and equality be maintained. In

response, the National Assembly declared that the King be imprisoned and

replaced by six ministers.

The mood of Paris changed quite suddenly as stores closed and

dignitaries left. Many attempted to escape from the city, fearing what would

come. Paranoia in Paris reached a feverous pitch, as the sans cullotes feared

that royalists, church spies, and counter revolutionaries would endanger the

revolution. This fear extended into the government as vigilance committees were

setup, passports were revoked, and hundreds were imprisoned if they were a

suspected enemy of the revolution. When news of a recent military defeat

reached Parisian ears, it was believed that treachery from inside the ranks had

been the cause. Danton was a man of action and power, a lawyer, he was

described as a “vehement tribune of the people”, and “voice of the revolution.”

In Paris, with scarred facial features due to accidents upon the farm as a boy,

Danton had become very powerful in the Insurrectionary Commune, becoming the

minister of Justice. His power added to that of the Girondists, a party of

lawyers and atheists, who were now the ruling party.

By the beginning of September, Danton was calling for all able men of

Paris to arm themselves and search every house to find any “enemy of the people”.

In his paper, Marat supported the execution of all counter revolutionaries.

Rumors around Paris circulated that the prisons would be raided, and those

inside would be killed. On the afternoon of September 2nd, the violence began

as a mob surrounded a number of coaches filled with priests to be brought to the

prison of L’Abbaye. The leader leapt onto the coach, thrusting and slicing with

his rapier. He shouted to the shocked crowd that watched on, “So, this

frightens you, does it, you cowards? You must get used to the sight of death.”

The words were quite prophetic, the even beginning the September Massacres.

Within the next five days over twelve hundred people would be brutally

slaughtered by the mass of armed Parisians. The next to be slaughtered was a

group of one hundred and fifty priests. As they were decapitated, one of the

priest’s demanded a fair trial. A mock tribunal was set up, and the priests

were decapitated one by one, their body’s thrown into a well. Every prison,

save for the ones that contained the prostitutes and debtors, was broken into as

the semptembriseurs, named for the month, slaughtered those in side. They

stopped only to eat and drink, sometimes on the naked corpses that littered the

ground. Strangely enough, a few lives were spared, by either compassion of

sheer luck, but it was nothing compared to the disgusting brutality with which

many of the murders were committed. One woman, charged with mutilating her

lover, had her breasts cut off as she was nailed to the ground, a bonfire set

under her spread legs. One septembriseur sliced open the chest of a noble,

removing the heart, squeezing it into a glass, and after drinking a sip, and

forced Mme de Sombreuil to drink to save her father. Undoubtedly, one of the

most gruesome acts was that of the Princess de Lamballe. She was raped, her

body mutilated and her breasts sliced off. Her legs were shot of a cannon, and

her genitals were cut off and paraded around Paris on a pike. The man who had

cut off her genitals had also supposedly cooked and eaten her heart. Her head

was placed upon a bar at a cafe’ where those there were asked to drink to her

death, before her head was placed on a pike and paraded under the Queen’s window.

At Bicetre, it was claimed that the prisoners were revolting, and that

they had to be put down. However, the prison held a large number of adolescents

who were detained there by their parent’s wish. Forty three people were killed,

all under the age of eighteen, of the one hundred and sixty two prisoners. By

the end, the septembriseurs were not pursued, in fact, some in the commune

commended their deeds as a necessary culling. To the outlying Provinces, the

killing of nearly half of the prisoners of Paris, was a clear message. In the

two weeks proceeding the deaths, members of the church and supporters of the

king were executed.

However, these troubles were soon followed by the battle of Valmy, which

the army of France had defeated the Prussians. If the leader of the Prussian

army, the Duke of Brunswick, would have moved swiftly enough, Paris might have

been taken, ending the revolution. However, reports have it that Danton paid

Brunswick to retreat back into Germany. The citizens in Paris left their

thoughts of murder and celebrated the great victory. Goethe, a German novelist,

concluded that, “Here and today begins a new era in the history of the world.”

as he watched the battle from a hill side. The statement found it’s truth in

France’s use of the citizen as a soldier, and the mobilization of such a massive

force.

A new force met at Paris, the next day. On September 21st, 1792, the

National Convention met. It looked like it’s predecessors, composed of mostly

the middle class with a few clergy and nobility, endorsing the Girondin.

However, the more conservative Girondin were prevented from voting in Paris,

allowing the radical Jacobin to gain power. However, one of the first acts of

the Convention was to abolish the monarchy, and began the New Republic, with

it’s own strange calendar. However, the Convention was deeply divided, as the

Girondin repeatedly tried to attack the Mountain, the highest seats in the

convention that belonged to the Jacobin leadership. Yet the Girondin blatantly

opposed the Parisians, their septembriseurs, and their Commune. They were in

support of the trying the king, but the Montagard, the Mountain, along with

Danton, would chose only to condemn him. Their deliberations on his fate lasted

until the winter months of the year.

By January, the King was in trial. On the 20th of the new year, the

King was tried, found guilty, and was sentenced to be executed the following day.

The Girondins hoped to save the king from death by proposing a bill to the

people of France. However, their attempts were futile, and only served to anger

the sans culottes. Those that gathered to watch the guillotining were mainly

the angry poor, and when the blade came down, they threw their hats in the air

shouting, “Vive la Nation! Vive la Republique!”

Yet, not all was as well as it seemed for the Revolution. The enemies

of the people had extended into foreign borders as European nations condemned

the execution of Louis XVI. The value of their money had lessened, food was

becoming more and more scarce, and the cost of living rose. The Convention took

a united stand against the violence of the sans culottes but still persecuted

the counter revolutionaries. The problems they faced were no small matter,

especially the peasant rebellion occurring in the Vendee. The peasant’s were

loyal to the King, and anti-republican, not wishing to participate in the