регистрация / вход

The First Amendment Essay Research Paper Persuasive

The First Amendment Essay, Research Paper Persuasive speech The First Amendment I. “Hey, hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” II. This is an example of what American citizens said when exercising their right of free speech during the era of the Vietnam War.

The First Amendment Essay, Research Paper

Persuasive speech

The First Amendment

I. “Hey, hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”

II. This is an example of what American citizens said when exercising their right of free speech during the era of the Vietnam War.

III. The issue I’ve decided to speak about is the importance of our First Amendment rights.

IV. There are three areas of the First Amendment that I am going to discuss. Namely:

A. The right to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for

change.

B. The right of the press to print whatever they want.

C. And of course the right to practice the religion of your choice.

Transition: Loosely translated, the First Amendment states that any

citizen is guaranteed the right to believe what they want to believe,

practice any religion they choose, and speak out about what they agree

or disagree with. It is our right to assemble peaceably in protest (or

support) and, when all else fails, petition the government for change

when the system is not working.

I. The fact that we can “assemble peaceably and petition for a redress

of grievances”, is a privilege that guarantees unto us the right to be

heard. Whether or not any progress is made is a different story, but we

are allowed in any case to bring our discontentment to light.

A. What if we were not allowed to gather together and speak our minds?

1. Such public displays of discontent are met with deadly force in other

regions of the world.

2. In June of 1989, in the People’s Republic of China, Tiananmen Square

was the site of such a demonstration by university students.

a. They were peacefully protesting for greater democracy and less

corruption.

b. The uprising was quelled by the military, and the press was

conveniently blacked-out so that everything was cleaned up by the time

foreign press could investigate.

c. The true body count will never be known for certain.

B. What if the United States was run in the same manner?

What if we were not allowed to openly criticize the government and the

way they run things?

1. In the 40’s, the Nazis rounded up those that didn’t conform, labeled

them “political enemies”, and sent them to the same concentration camps

that they sent to murder the gypsies and Jews of Europe.

2. This practice was also not uncommon to the North Vietnamese who

frequently engaged in “political re-education”, which was simply another

term for “killing” during the late 60’s.

Transition: I’ve just talked about the freedom to assemble and to talk

about the government, what about the press?

II. In light of events such as the recent Clinton/Lewinsky scandal in

reference to the Ken Starr report, and the tragic death of Princess

Diana, some might say that sometimes the freedom of the press is taken

too far.

A. Arguably, the Ken Starr report is one of the longest and most lurid

wastes of taxpayer money ever put into print.

1. Some feel that it isn’t necessary to include every little detail of

the President’s sexual indiscretions in a media circus for the entire

world to see.

2. Do we really need to know what exactly transpired? We are not his

judge or his jury.

B. Also unnecessary is the need to engage in a high-speed chase in order

to maintain one’s privacy.

1. On August 31, 1997, Princess Diana was killed in an automobile

accident while trying to escape paparazzi photographers-was this really

necessary?

2. Does the freedom of the press outweigh the freedom of the individual?

III. Also included in this Amendment is the freedom to establish any

religion and free practice thereof (so long as it doesn’t interfere with

another citizen’s “life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.”)

A. This does not hold true in all countries.

1. Recently, Cuba has celebrated Christmas for the first time since the

communists took power in the 60’s.

2. The government, having declared itself atheist in nature, decided

that such a holiday would interfere with productivity and was,

consequently banned.

a. Industries such as sugar, which depended heavily on human labor, were

no longer private corporations, but rather, they had been seized and

their profits went to the now more demanding communist government.

b. Mass absences for a religious holiday would not be tolerated and,

likewise, be seen as “an attempt to undermine the security of the

nation’s economy.”

B. That seems pretty harsh…skipping a day of work to celebrate the

holiday with one’s family is suddenly an act of treason?

I. We must be aware of our rights, and we must fight to uphold them.

A. We need to be able to gather together to bash our government if that

is our desire.

B. The press needs to be able to publish whatever they want. If the

government controlled the press, would we ever have found out about

Watergate?

C. We need the freedom of religion, to worship how we please. Even if

we don’t celebrate Christmas, who complains about a day off?

II. We may not agree with what is being said at a Klan rally, but we

damn well have to agree with the right to say it.

A. If we begin silencing groups based on whether or not we agree with

them, who’s to say who’s next? Who’s to say what’s right or wrong, and

more importantly, the right to speak one’s mind about it?

B. Perhaps, above all we need to make sure that we maintain our civil

liberties…to make certain that we don’t become the next Nazi Germany.

“For those who do not know their history, are doomed to repeat it…”

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

Комментариев на модерации: 3.

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ  [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий

Другие видео на эту тему