Media And Violence Essay Research Paper Violence
Media And Violence Essay, Research Paper
Violence in America Will it Ever End
Today in St. Paul two people were murdered. It has been reported that the two were fighting with a third party about a phone call that was made. The suspect is in custody and the case is under investigation, a reporter in the ten o clock news reports. Spouse
and child abuse are on the rise. This year alone over 6 million men, women, and children were victims of severe physical attacks from their spouses or parents (article 16)*, another reporter reports. Is it just me or does this seem like something that is all
too often heard on the news? The violent acts in the United States are out of control. But what can be done about it, and how much worse are things going to get? It seems to methat what is being done now isn t enough, because things just keeps getting worse.
There are twelve main things that have been being studied in depth lately by
sociologists. They include: spanking, child abuse, spouse abuse, the punishment for the
offenders, gun control, the media s affect on violence, the role sports play in violence,
the role religion plays in violence, pacifism, and international violence. My paper will
discuss each of these aspects as well as my opinions and state some facts.
Before I can say how I feel, I think there is a need to define violence,
aggressiveness, and assertiveness and explain the difference between them. Violence is a
physical act that intends to harm or hurt another person. Violence includes many things;
such as, hitting, punching, biting, killing, stabbing, shoving, and so much more. Violence
can be linked to two other words that have also become a part of every day life for many
people; aggression and being assertive. Aggression is a hostile, or destructive act that is
forceful. Aggression is usually related with someone being dominant. Being assertive is
to stating something (i.e. your opinion) boldly. Both aggression and being assertive do
not involve a physical force. Although these three words have different meanings, I think
they very closely related. When a person is being assertive and not getting their way, or
getting their point across, they can often become aggressive, and aggression often times
leads to a violent act. This domino effect closely relates all these words.
Violence, it has become something that society has to deal with every day now.
Much newspaper space is currently being given to violence–the violence that is
happening and the frequent cries to stop it, says that writer of article 3*. Just think of
the major world events that happened last couple years; Columbine, the Oklahoma City
bombing, Jonesboro, the increase of gang violence, or even the racist incidents that
happened at Champlin Park last year. All of these huge events involves at least one
violent reaction. Turn on the television for half an hour, the amount of violence,
assertiveness, or aggression you will notice in cartoons, sitcoms, or even on the news will
be extremely high. We are being exposed to violence more and more every day, and a lot
of times I don t think people even realize that they are being exposed. Watching
wrestling or a sport on television are two examples of this. It seems like society is
starting to see violence as something normal. A person getting murdered is no longer
headline news, it takes a immature kid to go and shoot eight classmates of his in order to
open people s eyes. People have become so used to hearing about someone being unable
to control themselves and lashing out at someone that they don t even turn their head
anymore when they hear about it. Violence, aggression and assertiveness are an everyday
part of life now.
Violence, and aggression are learned behaviors. …aggressive behavior is learned
very early in life and continues with the individual over many years, (article 18)*. Just
like a parent teaches a child to say please and thank you and be considerate of others,
they can teach them violence. A parent is probably the most important influence a
person has. Children not only look up their parents and admire them, they want to be like
them. When a child sees the person they admire hitting someone, or do something else
that could be characterized as violent, they begin to think it is okay to act in such a way.
After continuously seeing this violence they will become violent themselves. Society
also teaches violence.
We have produced a society in which there is a great pressure on males to
continually prove themselves. Much teaching in our society, including the role-modeling
in TV and movie fiction, reinforces the view that if males don t get what they want, or if
life has been unfair, they should go out and get even by beating up, even killing, other
people, (article 1). Society does this through the media, television, music, and other
things that are an important part of a child s life. Sometimes what defeats us is the
larger culture. American society is marvelous in its competitiveness and its autonomy
and its independence. But many times that spills over into a kind of me-first aggression,
this statement from article 1* agrees with me fully on my statement that society also
teaches violence. A child, for example, viewing a lot of television shows that incorporate
violence in their plot, sees that violence is okay. There are tons of television shows aimed
at children that have violence in them. Think of X-Men, Superman, Teenage Mutant
Ninja Turtles, and hundreds of other shows that are centered around violence.
Music has also gotten worse when it comes to promoting violence. The number
of CDs with the explicit lyrics sticker on it has probably tripled in the past 5 years. The
lyrics of songs have gotten much more graphic and are constantly talking about shooting
someone, or beating up a cop. The song just isn t a song without that in there now it
seems like. An example from article 16* that also supports society teaches violence is,
People reflect their culture in their behavior and they re just doing what they ve been
taught. Their hero on that show may beat up or even kill the villain which causes a
child to see this as okay to do. He then may go to school and beat another child up for
making him angry.
I think that violence roots from being left out, and having an anti-social life.
When a person has no friends, they can not relate to people and have little people skills.
Goldstein said he believes that antisocial behavior, including violence, is learned. One
is not born with it, (article 1). Teaching child to be social and have interpersonal
relationships throughout their life can definitely absolve people feeling left out and assist
a person in gaining social skills that are necessary in life.
How a parent chooses to discipline their child could shape who the child is for the
rest of their life. Therefore, a parent must be very careful on how they decide to punish
their youngster. My personal opinion on how a parent should deal with a child acting out
in a unfavorable way is to force the child to sit down and talk about what happened, why
it happened, and what they feel should be a punishment. I feel that this is a pretty hard
punishment for a child because most of the time a child will want to go sit in their room
for 5 minutes or have a toy taken away. This form of discipline was suggested to me in
article 1, which discussed a family that doesn t punish their kids using the conventional
methods. Instead, they talk to their children which has been proven to be a pretty harsh
punishment; His wife, Dianne, said, We do put a big value on talking…Sometimes the
kids will say Hit me. Just don t make me talk about it. As far as spanking goes, I
don t think a parent should EVER do this. In my opinion this is a form of child abuse. It
is hitting a child, and touching a child in an unloving way which constitutes as abuse.
Spanking a child, as a form of cultivation, has been shown to harm the child in
the future. Corporal punishment impairs the development of children, interferes with
the learning and increases the likelihood of vandalism and aggression, according to the
resolutionist, (article 2). If parents were aware of this, I highly doubt that they would
continue to use spanking as their form of punishment. They care too much about their
child s future to impair it. We need to provide more parenting support and education, for
not only parents, but also for those that work with children. I also think that it is very
hypocritical for a parent to spank a kid. I find even more hypocritical considering a
recent survey discovered that 75% of respondents opposed spanking, 55% believed it to
be an abusive act, 48% reported having spanked their children, (article 4). They are
constantly telling their children not to hit, that hitting is wrong, but then they go around
and spank their kid. They are giving mixed signals which just confuses a person and
doesn t help him/her at all.
Child abuse is defined, in my opinion, as any unwanted physical act that is
harmful toward the victim. I think society has become more lenient when it comes to
child abuse. It is considered tough love these days if a father beats his child mercilessly
for stealing a dollar from his mother s purse. Society has also begun to turn the other
way when they see child abuse. It isn t my problem so I shouldn t have to deal with it,
seems to be the current mentality of many US citizens. I would hope that if I saw a
parent hit their child I would have the courage and strength to seek the proper authorities
and inform them of the situation. I think that if everyone is so concerned with the
well-being of children and how parents are raising them, then they have to stop looking
in the other direction when they witness a child being punished beyond what they feel is
being disciplined. Once a parent is found guilty of child abuse they should have
mandatory parenting classes, anger management classes and go through many
psychological visits to find the roots of why they feel it is necessary to punish in this way,
and to teach them how to deal with things differently. I also feel that the abused should
see a therapist, to deal with the emotional scaring, and to avoid becoming abusers
The American family is second only to the military in the rate of injuries, and
that s only during war time, * as this quote from article 16 shows, spouse abuse is a
much bigger problem than most people think it is. In fact the number of violent lovers
is at about 25% (article 9*). To alleviate this horrid problem there needs to be stricter
enforcement and punishment for the abusers. Placing the accused in jail over night or
forcing them to go stay in a hotel for the night will only solve the problem for the night.
Article 7-A* agrees with me on this, Jail won t do much good. It will not make the
person stop all together.
Tougher things need to be done to the abuser. Jail time (for more than one night)
and mandatory counseling seems like a good idea to me to surpress that amount of
violence in relationships. The abuser needs to realize that they have a problem in order
to take the first step to fixing it. Spending a week or two in jail and going through
counseling may force them to come to reality. It doesn t matter how far along the
relationship has developed if a person places any part of their body on the other person
involved in the relationship in a way that is not wanted, it is abuse.
It is very hard for a woman to get out of a relationship when she is being abused.
…50% felt they could not get along without their partner…, (article 17-A)* This is
because of the love she feels for the man, and the happiness she has when he is not
violent always seem to make up for the abuse she endures. This is shown often in talk
shows; the men abuse the women but they can t get out because they love the man, have
children with him, or have happiness when he isn t abusing her. This was also brought to
my attention by article 9* which states that the person doesn t get out because they often
find separation harder to live with that the abuse. Reason: fear of loneliness or of losing
the status that comes from having a steady date. Women also find it hard to leave the
man because they have a tendency to see aggression as a kind of affection, (article 9).
Another thing that was brought to my attention about the person leaving the abuser is that
Nearly 30% of the couples had at some time taken abuse as a sign of love. And a
number considered violence a normal , even healthy part of a love affair. Three-quarters
of those who had been involved in an assault said it did not do their relationship any
harm. More than one-third felt that hitting, or being hit, actually improved their
relationship, (article 9).
I think that it is a lot harder for the woman to get out the longer she has been with
the man. When a relationship begins and the two are just dating I don t think it would be
as hard for the woman to walk away because she doesn t have a strong bond with the
man, and hasn t felt what his love is like. As the relationship develops and the two begin
to fall in love the amount of emotional pain a woman would have to go through to leave
increases. The two have now gotten closer and she knows both sides of him. The next
step in the relationship would be engagement then marriage.
Many couples involved in abusive situations during courtship go ahead with
their plans for marriage anyway, *(article 17-A). At this point it is extremely hard for
the woman to leave. She has now built her life around this man and more than likely
lives for him. She always has a glimmer of hope that he is going to change.
Society has pointed the blame on this problem on how the abuser grows up; One
in ten husbands who grew up in violent families are wife beaters, compared with one in
30 who grew up in nonviolent homes, (article 16). When a child grows up in a home
seeing their father abuse their mother, the violent behavior seems an acceptable part of
marriage. I also think that men beating their significant other has to do with a male s
power struggle and the need they feel to be above their wife.
Domestic abuse is something that is very hard to deal with for anyone, even the
police, because they are criticized for interfering in a family squabble at all and
criticized for not protecting victims, (article 8)*. The police currently have three ways
of handling domestic violence: mediating the fight, separating the couple, or arresting the
suspect, (article 8)* and none of these things seem to be working.
What needs to be done to alleviate this problem is to teach people differently
when they are younger about the roles they play in the dating game. Currently it seems
like the guys are taught to go to the girl for the date, and the girl is supposed to accept
and go out and be flirty. An example of this is found in article 10*, Despite all the
clamor and headlines about changing sex roles, young women still learn to be cute,
sexually attractive, flirtatious and submissive in a dating relationship. You know-laugh
at all the jokes, cuddle up, go where the date says to go. They aren t supposed to take
responsibility or control. The young man, meanwhile, still learns to play the aggressor.
He asks for the date, decides where to go, pays the expenses and drives. Getting rid of
the stereo-types society has set about who plays what role in the dating world, having
harsher punishments for abusers, and education women about abuse and how unhealthy it
really is could definitely begin to impair domestic and spouse abuse.
Other than murder, rape (unconsented and/or forced sexual activity) is the worst
crime that can be committed. It is the most scaring, frightening, painful, and the most
unethical. The statistics on rape are amazing, and very surprising. 50-60% of the men
said that under certain circumstances they might force a woman into sexual acts, , The
questionnaire asked men to rate, on a scale of one to five-one was no likelihood, five
was very likely – whether they would rape a woman in they could be assured that no one
else would ever know bout it, and if they would force a woman into sexual acts if they
could be assured of no negative consequences. 5-7% of college men admit to having
done something that could be interpreted as rape although a much higher percentage of
women report to having been victimized (raped). The difference may be partly
attributable to the fact that men don t consider using a modest amount of physical force
or some form of psychological manipulation as sexual aggression he said, (article 12*)
Another extremely surprising statistic is a rape occurs every seven minutes in the
United states…This adds up to over one million rapes a year, from article 15*. I think
what makes rape an even worse crime is the amount of times it goes unreported. The
victim usually feels really guilty and dirty. Sometimes the victim blames herself or
thinks that because she is on a date, she has somehow consented to sex. Or, if the
attacker used pressure and threats rather than physical violence, she may feel she did not
fight hard enough to stop the rape, (article 15). Also, Rape victims often blame
themselves for not foreseeing- and preventing- the incident. But, counselors say, these
feelings can be the biggest obstacle to moving past the experience. Realize it was a
violation that you had no control over and shove the blame back where it belongs- on the
shoulders of the attacker, (article 15).
It is very hard to convict a person of rape because there is a fine line between rape
and sex when it comes to evidence. It is hard for medical examiners to tell if the guy
really did force sex unless there are bruises or some other obvious physical signs.
Finding sperm evidence on the woman is not enough evidence to say for sure that the
woman was raped. In my opinion, we need to make it a more comfortable situation for a
woman to report the rape. We also need to have tougher punishments for the rapist. Life
in jail, with no bail and no appeals sounds great to me. I also think that we need to make
it easier to prove that a man is guilty. Using something like a lie detector test would help
greatly in this.
Death is sometimes punishment for rape and murders. I think that the invention
of electric chair, lethal injection machine, and all other things used for the death penalty
were the stupidest things ever invented. What were these people thinking when they
invented this? Did they actually think it would work? Did they ever consider that an eye
for the eye makes the world blind, or two wrongs don t make a right? What is the point
of having the death penalty? There isn t one! It hasn t lessened the amount of crime
present in America. Giving a criminal the death penalty is giving them the easy way out.
It is doing to them exactly what we are punishing them for in a lot of instances. How can
we preach one thing but then go against it to punish someone? It would be MUCH
harder for someone to sit in a brick square with no contact with the important people in
their life, no television, limited time outside, and arduous work all day long.
These convicted sex offenders, and murderers need is life imprisonment in a
maximum security prison with no parole, and no appeals. It is outrageous the amount of
people that go into prison on a 15 year sentence and get out many years before that.
How do people expect to make changes in the amount of violence in American when
they are consistently lenient on criminals? Why should we waste our money killing
someone when we can rehabilitate them and give them a real punishment by forcing
them to live the rest of their wasted life behind bars?
My thoughts on the death penalty agree with my thoughts on other life and death
issues. I am 100% against abortion and euthanasia also. I think that the main reason I
am against abortion is because of adoption. There are so many people that dream of
having kids and find out they can t. Adoption gives them the chance to fulfill their
life-long dreams. By allowing a woman to murder her baby, her own flesh and blood, we
are throwing away thousands of people s hopes and dreams. The person that wishes to
have the abortion needs to take responsibility for getting in bed with that man. There are
many precautions she could have taken, but chose not to. It is now him and her
responsibility to let that child live. They produced it, they must care for it, even if it is
only for the 9 months of pregnancy. Even in the case of rape, I am against abortion.
That woman can give up that child just like a woman can that didn t want the child.
I am also against doctor assisted suicide. If a doctor consents to taking a patient
off of life support or prescribe a drug that will kill them, they are committing murder.
All three of these life and death issues are wrong and should be outlawed!
It would be more difficult to commit murder if it was more difficult to get
weapons. Hand guns should definitely be banned. They should be allowed only for law
enforcement and those that are involved in the armed force. Article 24* uses statistics to
prove this, Deaths caused by firearms, most of them handguns, number about 40,000
each year in the United States. More than 1,600 of them are accidents. The number of
nonfatal injuries caused by hand gun accidents is four to six times higher.. guns are the
second most deadly consumer product, after cars, on the death market..some states the
death rate related to firearms already exceeded that associated with motor vehicles.
The ownership of guns increased the risk of homicide among teens and young
adults more than threefold and the risk of suicide is more than tenfold, (article 24).
Also, the availability of a gun greatly increases the likelihood that suicide attempt will
succeed. Nationwide, firearms– mostly handguns– are used in about 19,000 suicides
each year. Among young people from 10 to 19, more than 1,400 suicides are committed
with guns each year, (article 24).
For the safety of the entire nation, hand guns need to be banned. Research
shows that playing with toy guns prompts aggression and anti-social behavior, which may
include kicking, fist fighting, pushing and shoving, damaging property, and threatening to
hurt someone, (article 25*). As we learned before anti-social behavior as a child can
result in violence later on in life. Giving a child a toy gun is setting them up for a hard
time later in life when it comes to relating to people, and is setting them up for a violent
life style. Why would any parent want to ruin their child s life like that? I wouldn t want
to, therefore my children would never be allowed to play with any toy that resembles a
gun. This includes lazor shooters and a lot of toys that are popular now-days. This
would probably cause a lot of arguing, but I know that it would help my children in the
future because providing children with imitation weapons parents are, in effect, giving
tacit approval to the kind of behavior with which guns are closely associated: violence
and aggression, (article 25). If I knew that my child s friend had toy guns in their house,
I would still let them play there, but I would make sure the friends parents knew that my
child could not play with them. Most respectable people would take the toy guns away
while my child was there.
The second amendment makes banning handguns unconstitutional, in many
people s opinions. The second amendment gives the right to a well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed. My interpretation of this amendment is that a person has
the right to bear arms if they are protecting the security of the United States through
means of the armed forces only. When the Constitution was written violence with guns
was not a problem. Things have changed since then and so should the amendment. I
think it should read a person has the right to bear arms if it is necessary to the security of
the free state through the means of armed forces and law enforcement. This way there
would be no controversy over if we are being unconstitutional by making it illegal to
have a hand gun.
I think violence shown through the media should be regulated. When a person
turns on the television or radio they are bound to hear/see some sort of violence.
Children are viewing this and beginning to think all of this violence is okay, and
sometimes even a cool thing. If so and so artist sings this, or so and so actor kills
someone it is okay, it can t be morally unjust, is what many are beginning to think. The
media currently has the biggest impact on the growth of violence in America, I think.
Violence in television has gotten way out of hand, but due to the first amendment nothing
can be done through the judicial system. When the constitution allowed freedom of the
press I don t think that they know what would happen in the future. They never expected
songs to be about killing other people or television showing brutality.
Parent s can restrict the amount of violence, if any, that their child views by
purchasing the new v-chips. With these they can set a block that will not allow shows
with a certain rating to be viewed through their television. Also, many televisions have a
program where you can put a block on certain channels. In order to unblock the channel
you must know the code. These two things are very helpful and can diminish the amount
of violence seen through television.
Song lyrics also seem to have a lot more phrases in them that suggest or talk
about violent acts. CDs have stickers on them that say there are explicit lyrics in the
songs, but that doesn t seem to help. Music stores should have a law that says you cannot
buy a CD with this sticker on it unless you are eighteen years old. Producers should
supply CDs with the regular lyrics and CDs with edited lyrics. This way a twelve year
old child can listen to the music they enjoy without hearing the f-word every other word.
They can no longer be influenced by the type of music they enjoy. Just like we have a
rating system for television, we should have one for books, and music. Not as many kids
read books as do watch TV or listen to music, so that doesn t seem to be as big of a
problem. A problem that I see to be a lot larger than books would be the Internet and
computer games. Just look at the two boys from Columbine, constantly playing war
games on the computer and learning how to make bombs through the Internet. Somehow
the United States Government needs to regulate these games and the web sites placed on
the Internet. When it comes to my children I will definitely have restrictions on the
music they listen to, the television they watch, and what other things they do in their
spare time. I personally don t think a kid needs to see people being blown up or hear
about something shooting a cop to be entertained. If my ideas about alleviating the
amount of violence in the media happen in the next ten years I may not have to worry so
much about what restrictions I will have on my children.
Sport is set apart both cognitively and emotionally from the everyday world.
(article 29*) The way an athlete performs on the field, ice or in the ring does not reflect
they way there are as a human being. Playing the sport and the contact that goes along
with it has nothing to do with how the person acts on the streets. Contact is a major part
of the game, and I see nothing wrong with it. There is a problem, though, when the
athletes start to use their sports contact outside of the sport. There is a certain point in
which the severity of aggression is too high. Some aggressive acts are not acceptable.
The game is a game. You go out to win, but there s a line-limitations-there are
rules…You try to dominate the other player, but you don t want to make him leave the
game, supports what I am saying exactly (article 29). When a person paralyzes someone
because they tackled them something needs to be done; they need to be suspended from
the sport until they learn their lesson. It is part of the person s job as a sports figure to be
a person someone can look up to, and when things are taken too far or aggression is used
outside of the sport they aren t doing their job. Most people get fired when they don t do
their job, athletes should be fired just like everyone else. They should receive no special
treatment. Sports aren t encouraging violence in society in any way.
The three sports that have the most aggression in them are boxing, football, and
hockey. When a person signs up to play these sports they know that they are a very
physical game, and are consenting to what may happen to them while playing. I see
nothing wrong with these three sports at all. The physical contact is part of the game,
and without it what fun would it be to play and watch? I will let my children play sports
that involve physical contact but I will make sure they know the difference between what
is justified during the game, and that how they act while playing their sport will never be
allowed outside of the sport.
I don t think a person s religion makes a person for or against violence unless
they practice their religion purposely. People go to war a lot of times despite the fact that
they are Christian. People do seem to be as dedicated to their religion as they used to be,
therefore they are losing some of their morals and not following every aspect and rule of
their religion to a T . I think that the Christian commandment Thou shall not kill
means exactly what it says; don t kill-no exceptions. Even in the situation of war I don t
think that commandment allows people to kill. Therefore, I do not believe in the just war
theory. I don t believe in war period.
Religions shouldn t take a stance on things. They should let the people decide for
themselves how they feel rather than saying since you believe this you must also believe
this, because a lot of people have contrasting views now. Religion may be an important
part of people s lives because of what they believe in when it comes to a higher being,
but I don t think that it impacts every single part of their life. If Jesus were alive today I
think he would be extremely disappointed in everyone. He would probably be hurt that
people aren t following his ways to the extent he did, but things have changed a lot in
2,000 years and people can no longer be expected to follow every aspect of their religion.
Pacifism and civil disobedience have been effective many times (i.e. Ghandi, and
Martin Luther King Jr.). It can still be very effective when it is used. Ghandi and Martin
Luther King did a very brave things by trying to accomplish their goals non-violently
when the people they were against were only using violence. It seems like everyone
thinks that everything has to be solved with violence now, though.
I would have to say that I am a pacifist. IF something can be solved by means of
talking then do it. Not everything has to be solved by blowing up half a country and
killing thousands of innocent people. I would never ever go to war. I would flee to
Canada if they made it mandatory for women to fill out the draft cards. I am against war
100%. . Every minute, the world spends $1.3 million for military purposes, article 34*
claims. Some other interesting facts about what is spent for military purposes are:
The worlds stockpile of nuclear weapons represents an explosive force more than
5,000 times greater that all the munitions used in World War II.
The cost of one new nuclear submarine equals the annual education budget of 23
developing countries with 160 million school-age children. (article 34)
Why are we wasting all this time and energy on nuclear weapons when we could be
giving children a better education and educating them on how not to have war and how
to solve things peacefully. Everything can be solved nonviolently it just takes a lot more
time and effort. With how busy people s lifestyles are now, they just don t want to take
the time to sit down and work it out. I personally think that non-violent means of solving
things are a lot more productive than violent means. Look at how much Martin Luther
King Jr. accomplished in less than a year, then look at what little we have solved with the
Middle East since we went to war with them. What accomplished more? Martin Luther
King did. Non-violence accomplishes more in less time than violence does.
The United States and every other country all need to get together and sit down
and discuss calmly how they feel about things and work all their problems out. There is
no need to continue fighting. We should all be working together to make this entire
world a better place rather than being selfish and focusing only on our own country. If
we all worked things out there would no longer be international violence. This would be
a very lengthy process, but I think it would be worth it in the end. At this point getting
rid of all our nuclear weapons would be very dangerous for the United States. I am sure
that would be attacked as soon as we did it and would go to ruins. If we all agreed to do
it at the same time though I don t think there would be any surprise attacks. Not every
country is going to agree to this, though, so it is an unrealistic solution, in my opinion. I
would support the United States if they decided to disarm our country. I would probably
end up dying, but it would be worth it if the world would be peaceful in fifty years.
To get rid of each and every one of the problems mentioned above you are
going to need a wide variety of techniques. To get rid of child abuse, I first think that
spanking should be outlawed. If this happens there will be no fine line between tough
love and abuse. Any kind of hitting would be abuse. After this is done there needs to be
harsher punishments for those that are found as abusers. Counseling, stress management,
and anger management courses could be a big help. These three things could also
alleviate the high amount of spouse abuse. People also need to be educated about the
truth of spouse abuse, so women can stop making excuses as to why they are staying with
I also think that there should be an end to capital punishment. People are getting
the easy way out when they die. They should be sent to a maximum security prison with
no parole and no chance to appeal. This would be the harshest punishment for a person.
I also think that hand guns need to be banned, but first we must change the second
amendment. After handguns are banned by everyone except the armed forces and law
enforcement that amount of guns in homes and on the streets will drop drastically. I also
think there should be a banning on toy guns, so children don t continue to get the idea
that guns are cool and okay to play with.
We also need to start controlling what is shown on television. My suggestion for
this would be to have mandatory v-chips in televisions, so parents can control what their
children watch. We should also make it mandatory for a person to be 18 years of age to
purchase a CD with an explicit lyrics sticker on it. Magazines, just like movies, should
have a rating system, and the sale of computer games promoting violence should be taken
off the market. I also think that the Internet should be controlled better, and web sites
should have to be approved before they can be made available to the general public.
I don t see a problem with the amount of aggression in sports until it exceeds
what is necessary to defend yourself or your team. What I do see a problem with is what
sports figures do in their personal lives. When an athlete does something that is against
the law they should lose the privilege of being a professional athlete. To get rid of
international violence we need to have a peace conference where all the heads of the
nations meet and work things out peacefully.
I don t really know what to predict when it comes to the future of the violence. It
seems like whenever things seem to be looking up, something happens that makes the
future of world peace look bleak. I think that if people start to care more and take action
that things can change. We can no longer sit back and expect things to get better on their
own. If any of my suggestions were to go into affect I think that a lot of the violence in
America would decrease. I think the most important thing that needs to be done is
outlawing of handguns. If this were to happen, I think the amount of violence acts would
drop 50%. Unless this happens, violence will increase.
Violence has become a problem that is way out of hand. Something needs to be
done, and fast, or our once beautiful, peaceful country will go to ruins.
Article 1: Researchers Seek Cause of American Violence. John Barbour. Article 2: Minnesota psychologists call for law banning
spanking outside the home. Article 3: To reduce US domestic abuse, outlaw spanking, as in Sweden. Jacquelin Germain.
Article 4: Should Spanking be Illegal. Shari Roan. Article 7-A: The automatic apology can never right a wrong. Robert Treuer.
Article 8: Balancing Power in domestic disputes. Ellen Goodman. Article 9: Socko Performances on Campus. Article 12:
College sex rites often involve force. Gordon Slovut. Article 15: Date Rape. Alexa Bell. Article 16: Home is most violent place,
professor says. John Murphy. Article 17-A: Study bears violence in marriages-and before. Jamie Talan. Article 24: A gun in the
home is risky business. Jane Brody. Article 25: Should Children Play with Guns. Leah Yarrow. Article 29: Values and Violence
in Sports today. Brenda Bredmeier & David Shields. Article 34: $1.3 million expended per minute for military. Associated press.