регистрация / вход

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

Essay, Research Paper The Right To Keep And Bear Arms Thursday, 19 August, 1996 “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the

Essay, Research Paper

The Right To Keep And Bear Arms

Thursday, 19 August, 1996

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the

right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Bill of

Rights, Article II).

This seemingly simple phrase is probably the source of more debate and argument

than any other single sentence in American history. The argument is not black or

white, pro or con. Rather, it encompasses many shades of gray. At the one end of

the spectrum you have the National Rifle Association (NRA) which currently views

any type of gun control as an infraction against the Second Amendment of the

Constitution (”What is the NRA” 1). At the other end of the spectrum you have

groups like the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) and Handgun Control, Inc.

seek to make most firearms accessible only to law enforcement and the military

(”CSGV” 1). In the middle there are organizations such as the American Firearms

Association, who seek compromise regarding our rights (Lissabet, “Return” 2).

Some organizations that one would expect to participate in this debate are

noticeably quiet. One such group is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

In “The ACLU on Gun Control”, the national ACLU policy is neutrality (1).

All factions in this debate have some merit, some more than others. All use a

mixture of facts, figures, and emotions to express their views. I will be

presenting some of their history, their views, and how they make their cases.

The NRA is perhaps the most well known of the participants. They were formed

after the Civil War, in 1871, as an organization dedicated to the rifle

marksmanship of the state Militias. This was due to Union Army’s lack of

marksmanship. Following World War II, many returning veterans joined the ranks

of the NRA. They endured their share of military life and over time the NRA’s

mission was changed to that of a sportsman’s organization. This did not last

long.

Following the assassination of President Kennedy the Gun Control Act of 1968 was

passed. The act banned the mail-order sale of guns and ammunition. This act was

even supported by the NRA’s leaders. Within the NRA however, there was a growing

faction that opposed gun control in any form. This faction was set up as the

subordinate committee, Institute for Legislative Action (ILA). This faction

gained support and power and in 1977 gained control of the NRA. They have held

that power ever since.

Today’s NRA works to foster support for the shooting sports, to promote firearms

safety, responsibility, and freedom, and to protect Second Amendment rights from

infringement (”What is the NRA” 1). They take a very hard line in their

protection of Second Amendment rights. They believe that the right to keep and

bear arms is an individual right and work to oppose any legislation that will

infringe that right.

The AFA was founded in 1993. It seeks to protect the constitutional right to

bear arms while supporting fair and reasonable gun controls. They seek to

preserve the sportsman’s arms, rifles and shotguns, at the cost of the

recreational shooters arms, handguns (Lissabet, “Return” 3). This approach is

presented as a compromise to safeguard Second Amendment rights. They espouse to

support the Second Amendment, they also support the implementation of stricter

gun controls (Lissabet, “Anti-Federalism” 4). The AFA counts among its

membership many ex-NRA members. Some of these include the board members who were

forced out of the NRA in 1977.

The CSGV was founded in 1974. Its mission was to fight what they saw as a

growing problem of gun violence in the US. Their main goal is:

_the orderly elimination of the private sale of handguns and assault weapons in

the United States. CSGV seeks to ban handguns and assault weapons from

importation, manufacture, sale, or transfer by the general American public, with

reasonable exceptions made for police, military, security personnel, gun clubs

where guns are secured on club premises, gun dealers trading in antique and

collectable firearms kept and sold in inoperable condition. (”CSGV” 1). They

also seek to make the acquisition of the firearms that are still legal very

difficult. They seek to do this through limiting dealer licenses, restrictive

gun owner fees and regulations. Many other gun control measures are supported

and supported by the CSGV. They feel that the Second Amendment is a collective

right, to be held by the government and law enforcement agencies.

These three factions all manipulate the figures to show support for their views,

they use fear to gain the support of the people. In their own way they all

present valid arguments, yet none are completely right in their stand. The NRA

would be better served by supporting some measures of gun control such as the

national waiting period on the purchase of firearms. This measure will not

infringe on any ones right to keep and bear arms. By supporting this and other

reasonable measures, they will disarm the anti-gun lobby’s arguments against

firearms. The CSGV would get better results if they stopped attacking a citizens

rights and started working to combat the real problem, the criminal who uses

firearms. Despite all the numbers the CSGV uses to make the spectre of firearms

violence seem overwhelming, firearms in and of themselves are not dangerous, it

is the person who possesses the firearm that is dangerous (The Facts of Gun

Violence_ 1).

Gun controls do not control the criminal, they only keep the law abiding citizen

from protecting themselves. In a recent study, the Illinois Council Against

Handgun Violence reported that the states with restrictive gun laws have some

of the highest violent crime rates in the nation. Conversely, the states with

“right to carry” laws have a 21% lower violent crime rate (Cloud 1).

Works Cited

Cloud, David. “Anti-Gun Study Highlights Failure of Gun Control.” Fundamental

Baptist News Service 3 May 1996: 1

Lissabet, Ernest. “Anti-Federalism and the Second Amendment.” American Firearms

Association WWW Site: http://www.firearms.org/afa/federal.html.

Lissabet, Ernest. “The Return of the Old Guard.” American Firearms Association

WWW Site: http://www.firearms.org/afa/return.html.

“The ACLU on Gun Control.” ACLU WWW Site:

http://www.aclu.org/library/aaguns.html.

“The Facts of Gun Violence_” Coalition to Stop Gun Violence WWW Site:

http://www.gunfree.inter.net/csgv/basicnfo.html.

“What is the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence?” Coalition to Stop Gun Violence WWW

Site: http://www.gunfree.inter.net/csgv/csgvsumm.html.

“What is the NRA and how does it work?” National Rifle Association WWW Site:

http://www.nra.org/nra-precis.html.

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий