Death Penalty Discussion Essay Research Paper Is

Death Penalty Discussion Essay, Research Paper Is the Death Penalty Right or Wrong?The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the

Death Penalty Discussion Essay, Research Paper

Is the Death Penalty Right or Wrong?The idea of putting another human

to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the

act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a

death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is

beyond my own understanding. I know it must be painful, dehumanizing, and

sickening. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as

a society to see that it is done.

Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.

The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance

that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the

death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an

innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system,

not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in

which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death.

Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of

accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken.

These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take

human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the

advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the

advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh

the losses of the offender.

The second argument against capital punishment is that it is

unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and

minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this

is a separate issue.

It can’t be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a

lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet another

problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not

a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the

courts and their unfair system of sentencing.

The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some

supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital

punishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do not

agree and have a valid argument when they say, "The claims that capital

punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not

proven."

I am not refuting this accusation. In fact, statistics show that the

death penalty neither lowers or raises the incidence of violent crimes. I

am not a supporter of the death penalty because it might scare potential

criminals into thinking twice before they murdered someone (though it

would be nice if it did). I support the death penalty because it removes

individuals who threaten the lives of our citizens.

The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with

its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person

waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is

the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of

such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to

bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.

If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than

putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then

the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for

the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be

executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest

of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without

parole.

Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death

penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering

again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society

with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life,

liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is

the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else

is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this

foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all

they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this

society. The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers

from our society is the death penalty.

As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our

justice system is in need of reform. This reform will shape the future of

our country, and we can not jump to quick solutions such as the

elimination of the death penalty. As of now, the majority of American

support the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. Until

this opinion becomes the minority, America will continue to use the this

approach, and I will continue to support the death penalty.

"An eye for an eye," are what some Americans would say concerning

the death penalty. Supporters of the death penalty ask the question, "Why

should I, an honest hardworking taxpayer, have to pay to support a

murderer for the rest of their natural life? Why not execute them and

save society the cost of their keep?" Many Americans believe that the

death penalty is wrong. However, it seems obvious to some Americans that

the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers.

Is the Death Penalty Right or Wrong?The idea of putting another human

to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the

act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a

death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is

beyond my own understanding. I know it must be painful, dehumanizing, and

sickening. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as

a society to see that it is done.

Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.

The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance

that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the

death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an

innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system,

not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in

which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death.

Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of

accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken.

These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take

human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the

advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the

advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh

the losses of the offender.

The second argument against capital punishment is that it is

unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and

minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this

is a separate issue.

It can’t be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a

lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet another

problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not

a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the

courts and their unfair system of sentencing.

The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some

supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital

punishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do not

agree and have a valid argument when they say, "The claims that capital

punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not

proven."

I am not refuting this accusation. In fact, statistics show that the

death penalty neither lowers or raises the incidence of violent crimes. I

am not a supporter of the death penalty because it might scare potential

criminals into thinking twice before they murdered someone (though it

would be nice if it did). I support the death penalty because it removes

individuals who threaten the lives of our citizens.

The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with

its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person

waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is

the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of

such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to

bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.

If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than

putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then

the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for

the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be

executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest

of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without

parole.

Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death

penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering

again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society

with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life,

liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is

the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else

is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this

foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all

they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this

society. The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers

from our society is the death penalty.

As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our

justice system is in need of reform. This reform will shape the future of

our country, and we can not jump to quick solutions such as the

elimination of the death penalty. As of now, the majority of American

support the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. Until

this opinion becomes the minority, America will continue to use the this

approach, and I will continue to support the death penalty.

"An eye for an eye," are what some Americans would say concerning

the death penalty. Supporters of the death penalty ask the question, "Why

should I, an honest hardworking taxpayer, have to pay to support a

murderer for the rest of their natural life? Why not execute them and

save society the cost of their keep?" Many Americans believe that the

death penalty is wrong. However, it seems obvious to some Americans that

the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers.