Progression Towards Light Essay Research Paper Progression

Progression Towards Light Essay, Research Paper Progression Towards Light Aeschylus’ use of darkness and light as a consistent image in the Oresteia depicts a progression from evil to goodness, disorder to order. In the

Progression Towards Light Essay, Research Paper

Progression Towards Light

Aeschylus’ use of darkness and light as a consistent image in the

Oresteia depicts a progression from evil to goodness, disorder to order. In the

Oresteia, there exists a situation among mortals which has gotten out of

control; a cycle of death has arisen in the house of Atreus. There also exists

a divine disorder within the story which, as the situation of the mortals, must

be brought to resolution: the Furies, an older generation of gods, are in

conflict with the younger Olympian gods because they have been refused their

ancient right to avenge murders between members of the same family. The

Oresteia presents two parallel conflicts, both of which must be resolved if

harmony is ever to be desired again. As one can expect, these conflicts

eventually do find their resolutions, and the images of darkness and light

accompany this progression, thereby emphasizing the movement from evil to good.

The use of darkness imagery first emerges in the Agamemnon. In this

first play of the trilogy, the cycle of death which began with the murder and

consumption of Thyestes’ children continues with Clytaemestra’s murder of

Agamemnon and Cassandra. The darkness which is present in the beginning of the

story is further magnified by the death of Agamemnon. This is illustrated when

Clytaemestra says, ?Thus he [Agamemnon] went down, and the life struggled out

of him; and as he died he spattered me with the dark red and violent driven

rain of bitter savored blood? (lines 1388-1390). Clytaemestra has evilly and

maliciously murdered her own husband; thus the image of the dark blood. The

darkness is representative of the evil which has permeated the house of Atreus,

and which has persisted with this latest gruesome act of murder. Because

darkness results from the death of Agamemnon, Aeschylus clearly illustrates that

this murder was nothing but pure evil. As long as this type of evil continues

to be practiced in the house of Atreus, darkness will continue to emerge. The

Oresteia has not yet seen the light.

The beginning of the progression from darkness to light can initially be

seen in the second play of the trilogy, The Libation Bearers. Orestes is the

embodiment of this light, a beacon signalling a possible end in the evil that

has infected the house of Atreus. It is true that Orestes, in revenge for

Agamemnon, kills his mother Clytaemestra. Yet the darkness that is expected

from such a murder, a matricide, is negated by one of the main reasons that

Orestes commits the murder: his fear of the wrath of Apollo, who has ordered

him to commit the deadly act. Aeschylus provides Orestes with a justification

for his action in the form of the oracle from Apollo. For not only does

Orestes’ murder of his mother fail to differ greatly from Clytaemestra’s murder

of Agamemnon, but it can in fact be seen as a worse crime because of the blood

ties. Therefore, in order to convincingly prove his assertion that Orestes is

justified in killing his mother, Aeschylus must include the order from Apollo,

who by no mere coincidence is the god of light. With the divine support of the

light god on his side, Orestes is the beginning of the progressive illumination

towards goodness and order in the Oresteia.

Another example of Orestes’ introduction of light into a story of

darkness occurs later in The Libation Bearers. The chorus is describing the

dream that Clytaemestra has had of giving birth to a snake, which represents

Orestes. The chorus sings of Clytaemestra’s fear as she awakens from the

nightmare: ?She woke screaming out of her sleep, shaky with fear, as torches

kindled all about the house, out of the blind dark that had been on them? (lines

535-537). Aeschylus describes the house of Clytaemestra, the rightful house of

Atreus and the Atridae, as dark; this darkness has been caused by none other

than her own murderous deeds. She has dreamt of the coming of her son Orestes

to avenge his father, and the torches that light up the house signal this coming.

Clearly, Orestes is the man who will restore light to the house of Atreus.

Orestes is looked upon by those characters sympathetic to his plight

(namely Electra and the chorus of The Libation Bearers) as the light which will

bring an end to the evil in the house of Atreus. Soon after Orestes reveals his

identity to his sister, he proclaims that he will avenge his father’s murder.

The chorus, who represent the subjects of the late Agamemnon, express their

gratitude for Orestes’ decision when they say, ?But when strength came back hope

lifted me again, and the sorrow was gone and the light was on me? (lines 415-

417). Orestes’ arrival and his resolution to make his mother pay for her crimes

illuminates the darkness which Clytaemestra has brought upon the royal house;

the chorus, in proclaiming that the light is on them, recognize that Orestes is

the man who will achieve this illumination. Electra also recognizes that

Orestes will bring good to an evil situation: ?O bright beloved presence, you

bring back four lives to me? (lines 238-239). Orestes’ presence brightens the

dark, gloomy state of mind of Electra just as it brightens the dark, gloomy

situation in the house of Atreus.

Following the murder of Clytaemestra and Aegisthus at the hands of

Orestes, light is finally restored to the conflict within the mortal house of

Atreus. Orestes has fulfilled the oracle imposed upon him by Apollo, and the

darkness, the evil of Clytaemestra, has been defeated. In reference to this

defeat, the chorus proclaims, ?Light is here to behold. The big hit that held

our house is taken away? (lines 961-962). The disorder and darkness that had

reigned in the house of Atreus exists no longer; Orestes has given his family

illumination. The evil darkness has been overcome by the good light.

Another way in which Aeschylus manifests the imagery of light and

darkness is through the conflict between the Olympic and Chthonic gods. The

Olympic gods are represented in the Oresteia by Apollo and Athene. Aeschylus

ties together the ideas of justice and reason, Athene’s domain, with the idea of

light, of which Apollo is god. By contrast, the black clad Chthonic gods, the

Furies, tie together the idea of darkness with the idea of bloody revenge, which

is their area of specialization. In the Eumenides, Pythia says of the Furies, ?

They are black and utterly repulsive, and they snore with breath that drives one

back? (lines 52-53). The contrast between the two different races of gods sets

up Aeschylus’ second progression from darkness to light in the Oresteia.

The Furies are at first incapable of treating Orestes with the justice

that he deserves. They do not take into account the circumstances under which

Orestes killed his mother, specifically the pressure which he had received from

Apollo. Therefore, the Furies are at first enraged that Athene allows Orestes

to escape their dark and bloody vengeance. Eventually, however, the Furies’

hate begins to subside and they accept the arbitration of Athene, who offers

them land and honor in Athens. This acceptance marks the beginning of their

movement from darkness to light. They embrace the just attitude of the Olympic

gods Apollo and Athene, progressing from a doctrine of bloody revenge to one of

reason and justice. The light images emerge along with this progression, and

the Furies proclaim near the end of the Eumenides: ?So with forecast of good I

speak this prayer for them [the citizens of Athens] that the sun’s bright

magnificence shall break out wave on wave of all the happiness life can give ,

across their land? (lines 921-925). The Chthonic gods have given up their dark

ways and have called for light. This light image is also manifested in the

garments that the Furies change into at the end of the Eumenides: where they

had previously worn black robes, they now wear bright crimson robes. Now

calling themselves the Eumenides, or Benevolent Ones, these gods have progressed

from symbols of evil darkness into symbols of bright goodness.

In his trilogy the Oresteia, Aeschylus’ use of darkness and light

imagery coincides with his progression of themes. Orestes, who represents light,

brings and end to the vicious cycle of dark death continued by Clytaemestra. He

illuminates the dark evil in the house of Atreus. Likewise, Athene and Apollo

bring the Furies out of their dark, blood-lusting ways and into an order of

justice and reason, transforming them into the brightly clad Benevolent Ones.

In the end, goodness prevails over evil just as light conquers darkness.

Aeschylus effectively makes use of his images to emphasize this movement.