Untitled Essay Research Paper The question of

Untitled Essay, Research Paper The question of the reality of the soul and its distinction from the body is among the most important problems of philosophy, for with it is bound up the doctrine of a future

Untitled Essay, Research Paper

The question of the reality of the soul and its distinction from the body is among the

most important problems of philosophy, for with it is bound up the doctrine of a future

life. The soul may be defined as the ultimate internal principle by which we think, feel,

and will, and by which our bodies are animated. The term "mind" usually denotes

this principle as the subject of our conscious states, while "soul" denotes the

source of our vegetative activities as well. If there is life after death, the agent of

our vital activities must be capable of an existence separate from the body. The belief in

an active principle in some sense distinct from the body is inference from the observed

facts of life. The lowest savages arrive at the concept of the soul almost without

reflection, certainly without any severe mental effort. The mysteries of birth and death,

the lapse of conscious life during sleep, even the most common operations of imagination

and memory, which abstract a man from his bodily presence even while awake; all such facts

suggest the existence of something besides the visible organism. An existence not entirely

defined by the material and to a large extent independent of it, leading a life of its

own. In the psychology of the savage, the soul is often represented as actually migrating

to and fro during dreams and trances, and after death haunting the neighborhood of its

body. Nearly always it is figured as something extremely volatile, a perfume or a breath.

In Greece, the heartland of our ancient philosophers, the first essays of philosophy took

a positive and somewhat materialistic direction, inherited from the pre-philosophic age,

from Homer and the early Greek religion. In Homer, while the distinction of soul and body

is recognized, the soul is hardly conceived as possessing a substantial existence of its

own. Severed from the body, it is a mere shadow, incapable of energetic life. Other

philosophers described the soul’s nature in terms of substance. Anaximander gives it an

aeriform constitution, Heraclitus describes it as a fire. The fundamental thought is the

same. The soul is the nourishing agent which imparts heat, life, sense, and intelligence

to all things in their several degrees and kinds. The Pythagoreans taught that the soul is

a harmony, its essence consisting in those perfect mathematical ratios which are the law

of the universe and the music of the heavenly spheres. All these early theories were

cosmological rather than psychological in character. Theology, physics, and mental science

were not as yet distinguished.

In the "Timaeus" (p. 30), one of Plato’s writings, we find an

account derived from Pythagorean sources of the origin of the soul. First the world-soul

is created according to the laws of mathematical symmetry and musical harmony. It is

composed of two elements, one an element of "sameness", corresponding to the

universal and intelligible order of truth, and the other an element of distinction or

"otherness", corresponding to the world of sensible and particular existences.

The individual human soul is constructed on the same plan.

The Stoics taught that all existence is material, and described the soul as "a breath

pervading the body". They also called it Divine, a particle of God; it was composed

of the most refined and ethereal matter. They denied absolute immortality; relative

immortality, ending with the universal conflagration and destruction of all things, some

of them admitted in the case of the wise man. Yet many others, such as Panaetius and

Posidonius, denied even this, arguing that, as "the soul began with the body, so it

must end with it".

With Socrates came a revolution in all manners

of thought. As, perhaps, the most influential of philosophers, and also one of the best

known, it is truly unfortunate he left the future so little of his theories. Only through

the writings of his students have we any idea of his philosophy. In the writing of Plato

much thought is given to the concept of the human soul. Socrates presents the soul having

three major ideas associated with it. The human soul is immortal, immaterial, and moral.

The question of immortality was a principal subject of Plato’s speculations. In the

"Phaedo" the chief argument for the immortality of the soul is based on the

nature of intellectual knowledge interpreted on the theory of reminiscence of past lives;

this implies the pre-existence of the soul, and logically derives its eternal

pre-existence. The human soul is eternal, existing with neither beginning nor end.

With Socrates, the individual aspects of the soul became dominant. It’s individuality and

its strict separation with the body. In dominant thought prior to the introduction of

Socratic ideas, the human soul was naught but a small part of a great world-soul; a soul

that included the souls of every creature and every object upon the earth and in the

universe. In this scenario the actions of a human were of no consequence directly to the

soul. There could be no concept of morality having any impact on personal life beyond the

immediate. To Socrates the soul is the center of all human morality, the embodiment of

"the good" in the human consciousness. Rather than just proceeding to rejoin the

world-soul the individual soul must pay reparation for life on earth. A human that lives

immorally, with disregard to the good will impact the future of his soul. In Greek

philosophy the souls that are damned live for eternity in a place of torture and torment.

The individual soul gives humans motive for leading lives that are good and just. In

Socrates own words "It is better to suffer injustice than to serve injustice."

The care of the soul becomes dominant over the body. Care for the immortal aspects of the

human and rewarding life after death will follow.

Socrates ties an abstract set of values to the existence of the soul.

To lead a life that is good and just is to seek throughout ones life the ultimate

understanding; to fully recognize the good in the universe and to understand its place.

Without the realization of this good we are unable to fully comprehend any form of

existence. I originally found fault with this assessment of life and the soul as a result

of the seemingly complex and abstract values that a soul must live by. Upon further

reflection the ultimate purpose of the soul is to seek understanding. Though abstract in

nature, this goal is one that can be applied to every individual regardless of culture,

creed or religion. Though I first considered this one of the week points in the Socratic

theory in truth its universality, is one of its strengths.

Socrates’ introduction of the individual soul includes an aspect of

motive to the nature of existence. With this new found individuality a soul must worry

about its existence, if it acted properly it would ascend to the Greek concept of eternal

bliss. In my own unworthy opinion, to act with personal benefit in mind is to act

selfishly and therefore immorally. I concede to Socrates that a truly selfless act is

impossible, for as humans we always have an ulterior motive behind the closed door of our

direct consciousness. Why should it be different for the eternal existence of our soul?

Though we may always have goals to work towards, basing ones life on the condition of

afterlife is self defeating. Life must be lived from day to day with actions that further

ones own immediate goals, whether they are to bring joy to others or to live quietly in

peace. To have the thought of eternal salvation looming overhead is to live life with a