Clear Vision In King Lear Essay Research 2

Clear Vision In King Lear- Essay, Research Paper Clear Vision in King Lear- In Shakespeare’s classic tragedy, King Lear, the issue of sight and its relevance to clear vision is a recurring theme.

Clear Vision In King Lear- Essay, Research Paper

Clear Vision in King Lear-

In Shakespeare’s classic tragedy, King Lear, the issue of

sight and its relevance to clear vision is a recurring theme.

Shakespeare’s principal means of portraying this theme is through the

characters of Lear and Gloucester. Although Lear can physically see,

he is blind in the sense that he lacks insight, understanding, and

direction. In contrast, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains

the type of vision that Lear lacks. It is evident from these two

characters that clear vision is not derived solely from physical

sight. Lear’s failure to understand this is the principal cause of his

demise, while Gloucester learns to achieve clear vision, and

consequently avoids a fate similar to Lear’s.

Throughout most of King Lear, Lear’s vision is clouded by his

lack of insight. Since he cannot see into other people’s characters,

he can never identify them for who they truly are. When Lear is

angered by Cordelia, Kent tries to reason with Lear, who is too

stubborn to remain open-minded. Lear responds to Kent’s opposition

with, “Out of my sight!,” to which Kent responds, “See better, Lear,

and let me still remain” (I.i.160). Here, Lear is saying he never

wants to see Kent again, but he could never truly see him for who he

was. Kent was only trying to do what was best for Lear, but Lear could

not see that. Kent’s vision is not clouded, as is Lear’s, and he knows

that he can remain near Lear as long as he is in disguise. Later,

Lear’s vision is so superficial that he is easily duped by the

physical garments and simple disguise that Kent wears. Lear cannot see

who Kent really. He only learns of Kent’s noble and honest character

just prior to his death, when his vision is cleared. By this time,

however, it is too late for an honest relationship to be salvaged.

Lear’s vision is also marred by his lack of direction in life,

and his poor foresight, his inability to predict the consequences of

his actions. He cannot look far enough into the future to see the

consequences of his actions. This, in addition to his lack of insight

into other people, condemns his relationship with his most beloved

daughter, Cordelia. When Lear asks his daughters who loves him most,

he already thinks that Cordelia has the most love for him. However,

when Cordelia says, “I love your Majesty/According to my bond, no more

nor less” (I.i.94-95), Lear cannot see what these words really mean.

Goneril and Regan are only putting on an act. They do not truly love

Lear as much as they should. When Cordelia says these words, she has

seen her sisters’ facade, and she does not want to associate her true

love with their false love. Lear, however, is fooled by Goneril and

Regan into thinking that they love him, while Cordelia does not. Kent,

who has sufficient insight, is able to see through the dialogue and

knows that Cordelia is the only daughter who actually loves Lear. He

tries to convince Lear of this, saying, “Answer my life my

judgment,/Thy youngest daughter does not love thee least”

(I.i.153-154). Lear, however, lacks the insight that Kent has. He only

sees what is on the surface, and cannot understand the deeper

intentions of the daughters’ speeches. As his anger grows from the

argument, his foresight diminishes as he becomes increasingly rash and

narrow minded . When Lear disowns Cordelia, he says, “we/Have no such

daughter, nor shall ever see/That face of hers again” (I.i.264-266).

He cannot see far enough into the future to understand the

consequences of this action. Ironically, he later discovers that

Cordelia is the only daughter he wants to see, asking her to “forget

and forgive” (IV.vii.85). By this time, he has finally started to gain

some direction, and his vision is cleared, but it is too late for his

life to be saved. His lack of precognition had condemned him from the


Lear depicts Shakespeare’s theme of clear vision by

demonstrating that physical sight does not guarantee clear sight.

Gloucester depicts this theme by demonstrating clear vision, despite

the total lack of physical sight. Prior to the loss of his eyes,

Gloucester’s vision was much like Lear’s. He could not see what was

truly going on around him. Instead, he only saw what was presented to

him on the surface. When Edmund shows him the letter that is

supposedly from Edgar, it takes very little convincing for Gloucester

to believe it. As soon as Edmund mentions that Edgar could be plotting

against him, Gloucester calls him an “Abhorred villain, unnatural,

detested, brutish villain” (I.ii.81-82). He does not even stop to

consider whether Edgar would do such a thing because he cannot see

into Edgar’s character. At this point, Gloucester’s life is headed

down a path of damnation similar to Lear’s because of a similar lack

of sight.

When Gloucester loses his physical sight, his vision actually

clears, in that he can see what is going on around him. When

Gloucester is captured by Cornwall, Gloucester provokes him to pluck

out his eyes:

But I shall see

The wing d vengeance overtake such children.

Cornwall. See’t shalt thou never. Fellows, hold the chair.

Upon these eyes of thine I’ll set my foot. (III.vii.66-69)

When Gloucester is saying this, he still lacks clear vision, and would

never have seen vengeance taken upon Cornwall. When Cornwall puts out

his eyes, Gloucester’s vision becomes clear from this point on, and he

later discovers that Cornwall was killed. Ironically, Gloucester does

not see vengeance until after he is blinded. In this sense, Cornwall

also suffers from clouded vision because his death is a direct result

of his blinding of Gloucester, when a servant kills him. As a result,

Gloucester is spared and his vision is cleared, while Cornwall is left

a victim of his own faulty vision.

From this point onwards, Gloucester learns to see clearly by

using his heart to see instead of his eyes. It is evident that he

realizes this when he says:

I have no way and therefore want no eyes;

I stumbled when I saw. Full oft ’tis seen,

Our means secure us, and our mere defects

Prove our commodities. (IV.i.18-21)

In this, he is saying that he has no need for eyes because when he had

them, he could not see clearly. He realizes that when he had eyes, he

was confident that he could see, while in reality, he could not see

until his eyes were removed. Afterwards, he sees with his mind instead

of his eyes.

Gloucester’s vision can be contrasted with that of Lear. While

Lear has the physical sight that Gloucester lost, Gloucester has the

clearer vision that Lear will never gain. When Lear and Gloucester

meet near the cliffs of Dover, Lear questions Gloucester’s state:

No eyes in your

head, nor no money in your purse? Your eyes are

in a heavy case, your purse in a light, yet you

see how this world goes.

Gloucester. I see it feelingly. (

Here, Lear cannot relate to Gloucester because his vision is not

clear, and he wonders how Gloucester can see without eyes. Although

Lear has seen his mistakes, he still believes that sight comes only

from the eyes. Gloucester tells him that sight comes from within.

Vision is the result of the mind, heart, and emotions put together,

not just physical sight. This is a concept that Lear will never


In King Lear, clear vision is an attribute portrayed by the

main characters of the two plots. While Lear portrays a lack of

vision, Gloucester learns that clear vision does not emanate from the

eye. Throughout this play, Shakespeare is saying that the world cannot

truly be seen with the eye, but with the heart. The physical world

that the eye can detect can accordingly hide its evils with physical

attributes, and thus clear vision cannot result from the eye alone.

Lear’s downfall was a result of his failure to understand that

appearance does not always represent reality. Gloucester avoided a

similar demise by learning the relationship between appearance and

reality. If Lear had learned to look with more than just his eyes, he

might have avoided this tragedy.