Dialogue On The Two Great World Systems Essay, Research Paper Does the trial of Galileo indicate that the church was hostile to new ideas in science? Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) proved to be the first dramatic example of conflict between science
Dialogue On The Two Great World Systems Essay, Research Paper
Does the trial of Galileo indicate that the church was hostile to new ideas in science?
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) proved to be the first dramatic example of conflict between science
and religion. Galileo introduced and correctly explained the idea- what is the acceleration of a
free falling object, by doing this he quashed the previous theories of his predecessor, Aristotle.
Aristotle came up with the theory that the weight of an object and the medium through which it
was moving determined the downward speed of the object. Galileo, after having carried out
numerous experiments concluded that in a vacuum, an object accelerated independent of its
weight. He proved this by rolling a ball down a ramp at different angles and calculated the
acceleration. He found that the rate of acceleration was constant, according to the equation:
a=v/t. Aristotle s thoughts tended to deal with the physical world we live in, Galileo on the other
hand was more concerned with an ideal world.
The modern age of science began in 1543 with the publication of Copernicus s book On
the revelation of the celestial orbs . A key feature of the new science was mathematical
reasoning and quantifiable observations. According to the Copernican model the planets and the
earth revolve around the sun, this is accurate although mathematically simpler. One of the
important changes taking place was that people began to view the earth as a mathematical
structure, relationships were quantative, not qualative as they had been for Aristotle. The
scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century owes a lot to maths. Galileo found additional
evidence to support the copernican theory, with a combination of theory and experiment, which
was essential to his study, this can also be traced back to Archimedes in Ancient Greece.
At first the church didn t take Copernicus s theory very seriously as astronomy and maths
didn t seem to have any significant philosophical or theological relevance although Copernicus s
book was dedicated to Pope Paul III and he received it gratefully. Copernicus still made use of
Ptolemy s cycles and epicycles and he also borrowed from Aristotle the idea that the planets
must move in circles because it is the only perfect form of motion. In reality copernicus s book
marked a change in human thought. Owen Barfield, in his book Saving the Appearances calls it
the real turning point in the history of science. It took place when copernicus began to think,
and others, like Kepler and Galileo , began to affirm that the heliocentric hypothesis not only
saved the appearances, but was physically true It was not simply a theory of the nature of
celestial movements that was feared but a new theory of the nature of theory; namely that , if a
hypothesis saves all the appearances , it is identical with the truth. Copernicus s book stated that
the earth was not at the centre of the universe with the sun revolving around it, this is
problematic for Christians who viewed the Aristotlian image of the earth at the centre as in the
bible the sun moves around the earth; Joshua 10:13
And the sun and moon stood still, till the people revenged themselves of their enemies. Is not
this written in the book of the just? So the sun stood still in the midst of the heaven, and hasted
not to go down the space of one day.
It took Copernicus four years to have the confidence to publish the book, he wasn t afraid about
how the church would react but how academics would view it. He was afraid because Aristotle s
work was highly praised whereas he was introducing a new, unproved system of cosmology
which apparently went against the teachings of the bible.
In 1609 telescopic observations of the skies were made by Galileo. After hearing about
the invention of a telescope in Holland he built one for himself and what he found were to have
major consequences for the Aristotelian cosmos. Using the telescope he saw that the sun is a
lump of rock like the earth, not a perfect sphere and he assumed that other planets are the same.
He also discovered that the planet of Jupiter had at least four satellites and the phases of Venus ,
meaning that Venus moves around the sun and not the earth. What he was actually saying was
that the earth is just an ordinary planet and that stars must be much further away, or you would
see the motion of the earth. Motion is trivial compared to the distance of the distance of the sun
to the nearest star and stars are so bright, like our own sun. The problem this posed was that the
earth seems to be insignificant physically as the universe is so big, so does this mean it is also insignificant spiritually?
Protestants found it very difficult to come to terms with Copernicus and the Catholic
church were resistant to change. During the seventeenth century there were many problems for
Christians coming to terms with these new discoveries. A leading Jesuit astronomer of the time,
Christopher Calvius was at first skeptical of Galileo s observations but once he saw the planet
Jupiter for himself through a telescope he knew what Galileo was saying was correct. The Jesuits
then confirmed the theory about the phases of Venus although they came up with the system of
Tycho Brahe, which had all the planets orbiting the sun, except the earth.
In 1611 Galileo visited Rome where Pope Paul V offered his support, then he returned to
Florence where he became obsessed with the Copernican theory and where he discussed, argued
and sold the Copernican model at every opportunity. Galileo wanted to convert the public to his
way of thinking. Galileo s trial by the Inquisition would not have taken place had he been more
diplomatic although Galileo was overly confident and not very tactile. The church were not
totally hostile to science although they did have problems with this particular area. There are also
strong suspicions that trial was his own fault, he was insensitive and his book poked fun at the
pope. There wasn t a clash of principles but an unfortunate misunderstanding of how galileo had
handled the church.
Galileo s situation was extremely ironic, he was obsessed with the Copernican model and
intent on ramming it down the throat of the Catholic Church yet at the beginning of his campaign
he was held in high regards by the church. His views left the church with three options;
i) to accept the Copernican model(even though it wasn t properly proven) and to adapt Scripture to this theory,
ii) to condemn it, or
iii) that the Copernican theory could be accepted but only as a hypothesis until proof could be supplied. Galileo rejected this.
As far as the church was concerned the Copernican model was such a controversy as it implied
that due to the immensity of the universe, humans might be peripheral to the creation and the fact
of biological evolution, evolution changes our view of ourselves(therefore we aren t a special
creation). Several biblical passages were also read as indicating a stationary earth, this wasn t
what Galileo thought.
Galileo himself knew that he could not prove heliocentricism. He couldn t even answer
an argument brought forward by his predecessor, Aristotle. That is, if the earth did go around the
sun then there would be a shift in the position of a star observed from the earth on one side of the
sun , and then six months later from the other side. This was not answered until 1838 by
Another problem which Galileo encountered was that he was adamant that despite
discoveries by Kepler, that the planets orbit the sun in perfect circles. Despite this Galileo sent
letters and articles throughout Europe and he was involved in disputes with churchmen which
only proved to decrease his popularity among the church.
As Galileo was so confident and not afraid to speak his mind he moved his debate from a
scientific background onto theological grounds. Had Galileo s arguments remained purely
scientific there is no question that the church would have shrugged them off but in 1614 Galileo
insisted that he had to answer queries about this new science contradicting certain passages of
the bible, some of the bible passages cited are;
Ecclesiastes 1:4-6 ,
the earth abideth forever. The sun also riseth , and the sun goeth down and hastethto his place
where he arose. The wind goeth toward the south and turneth about the north, also
the world also is stabilished that it cannot be moved
and Psalm 104:5,
who laid the foundation of the earth, that it should not be removed forever.
Also Joshua which I have previously mentioned. The literal meaning of these passages would
have to be scraped if the Copernican model was to be believed.
Galileo addressed this problem in his letter to the Grand Duchess Christina in 1615. He
laid down interpretations of when science theories seem to conflict with the literal interpretation
of the scripture. First of all Galileo claims that science and religion are independent of one
another, that they have both dofferent goals and are irrelevant to each other, for example,
theology is neutral in respect to cosmology and he goes on to describe how these scientific
theories should be evaluated by scientific criteria alone. If Galileo had adhered to what he
proposed and the church had accepted it, a conflict between Galileo and the church would never
have taken place.
In December 1614 a Dominican priest named Thomas Caccini held a sermon in Florence
which was anti-Copernican and which was a clear attack against Galileo. One month later and
another Dominican, Father Niccolo Lorini, read a copy of Galileo s letter to Castelli and was
very annoyed how he adapted scripture to suit his own purposes. He sent a copy to the
Inquisition in Rome, slightly altering Galileo s words although the case was dismissed.
At this point Cardinal Bellarmine , one of the most important theologians of the Catholic
Reformation proposed a face saving compromise for Galileo. In 1615, he wrote a letter outlining
the church s position. He said that it was acceptable to keep the Copernican model but only as a
hypothesis and if there were real proof that the earth circles the sun, then we should have to
proceed with great circumspection in explaining passages of scripture which appear to teach the
Galileo was however determined to have a showdown and so he went to Rome to
confront Pope Paul V. He referred the matter to the Inquisition and apparently an injuction was
sent to Galileo telling him to abstain altogether from teaching or defending this opinion and
doctrine, and from even discussing it . It is debated whether this is genuine or was forged.
Sixteen yers later Galileo wrote his famous Dialogue on the two great world systems
which began the famous trial of Galileo in 1633. Galileo was summoned before the Inquisition in
Rome, he was condemned and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.
It is unfair to say that the church has been hostile to new ideas in science. There have
been a number of areas where religion has promoted science, for example , Kepler s discovery
that the planets orbit the sun in ellipsis. Also Newton s idea that the pull of gravity holds planets
around the sun, the Catholic Church have paved the way for people like Galileo and Newton.
|◯||Galileo Galilei Essay Research Paper Galileo Galilei15641642Galileo|
|◯||Galileo Essay Research Paper Galileo Galilei Galileo|
|◯||Galileo Essay Research Paper Galileo|
|◯||Galileo Essay Research Paper Galileo Galileo was|
|◯||Galileo Galilei Essay Research Paper Galileo Galilei1564|
|◯||Eiseley And Galileo Their Views Essay Research|
|◯||Galileo Galilei Essay Research Paper Galileo GalileiThe|
|◯||Galileo And Newton Essay Research Paper Galileo|
|◯||Galileo And Church Essay Research Paper Galileo|
|◯||Galileo Galilei Essay Research Paper Galileo GalileiFrom|