Смекни!
smekni.com

Западноевропейское искусство от Хогарта до Сальвадора Дали (стр. 3 из 12)

a) Apotheosis of Homer

b) Comtesse d'Houssonville

c) Valpinson Bather

V. Translate the text into English.

Жан Огюст Доменик Энгр, превративший давидовский классицизм в академическое искусство и вступивший в противо­борство с романтиками, в семнадцатилетнем возрасте приехал в Париж в ателье Давида. Усвоив классическую систему с ее куль­том античного классицизма, Энгр отказался от революционности стиля своего учителя и стремился уйти от реальной жизни в мир идеального.

В картинах 1810-х годов, оставаясь преданным античным темам, Энгр обращался и к сюжетам из средневековья. Основным произведением художника в это время стал алтарный образ для церкви города Монтобана. Энгр решил образ мадонны близким к Сикстинской мадонне. Эта работа принесла художнику успех в Салоне в 1824 году. Однако некоторые произведения Энгра, та­кие как "Портрет художника Франсуа Мариуса Гране" и "Купальщица Вальпинсон", предвещают новое мироощущение романтиков.

Последние годы жизни Энгра были омрачены битвами сначала с романтиками во главе с Делакруа, затем с реалистами, которых возглавлял Курбе.

VI. Summarize the text.

VII. Topics for discussion.

1. The principles of Ingres's painting.

2. Ingres's style and characters.

UNIT V GOYA (1776-1828)

The greatest artistic genius of the turn of the eighteenth cen­tury was a Spaniard, Francisco Jose de Goya у Lucientes. He made a trip to Italy and was not impressed either by antiquity or by the Renaissance. Goya was a lifelong rebel against artistic or intellectual straitjackets. He managed to skip the Neo-classical phase entirely and passed directly from a personal version of the Rococo to Romantic stage.

In 1786 Goya was appointed painter to the king and in 1799 he became the first court painter. After 1792 Goya was totally deaf, and it liberated him from some of the trivialities of life for meditation on its deeper significance. Goya's brilliant portraits of the royal court may have been influenced by Gainsborough. But his characterisations are far more vivid, human and satiric. Goya's supreme achievement in portraiture is the Family of Charles IV, painted in 1800, an inspired parody of Velazquez's Las Meninas. Thirteen members of the royal family, representing three genera­tions, are assembled in a picture gallery of the palace, with Goya himself painting a large canvas in the shadows at the left. The king, with his red face and with his chest blazing with decorations, and the ugly ill-natured queen are painted as they were. Alfonce Daudet called them "the baker's family who have just won the big lottery prize". Goya's purpose is deeper than satire: he has un­masked these people as evil. Only some of the children escape his condemnation.

The Maja Desnuda is one of the most delightful paintings of the female nude in history. There exists a sketchier clothed version of the picture. The nude was formerly explained as an unconven­tional portrait of the duchess of Alba, a patron and a close friend of Goya's.

The frivolity of this picture contrasts with Goya's denuncia­tion of the inhumanity of warfare, of which the most monumental example is The Third of May, 1808, at Madrid: The Shooting on Principe Pio Mountain, depicting the execution of Madrid rebels by Napoleonic soldiery. The painting commissioned by the liberal government after the expulsion of the French in 1814 and 'done in the same year, is the earliest explicit example of "social protest" in art. Previously the warfare had been generally depicted as glori­ous, cruelties - as inevitable. Goya treats the firing squad as a many-legged, faceless monster, before whose level, bayoneted guns are pushed groups of helpless victims, the first already shattered by bullets and streaming with blood, the next gesticulating wildly in the last seconds of life, the third hiding the horror from their eyes with their hands. A paper lantern gives the only light; in the dimness the nearest houses and the church tower of the city almost blend with the earth against the night sky. Through the medium of broad brushstrokes, Goya communicates unbearable emotion with thick pigment, achieving at once a timeless universality and an immediacy of the reality of the event.

Goya's passionate humanity speaks uncensored through his engravings. Goya made several series of etching-aquatints, the earliest of which Los Caprichos (The Caprices), of 1796-98, is widely imaginative. The first section, dealing satirically with events from daily life, is surpassed by the second, devoted to fantastic events enacted by monsters, witches, and malevolent nocturnal beasts from the demonic tradition of Spanish folklore.

The introductory print of the second section shows the artist asleep at his table loaded with idle drawing instruments, before which is propped a tablet inscribed "El sueno de la razon produce monstruos"("the sleep of reason produces monsters"). Reason, the goddess of the 18-th century philosophers, once put to sleep, al­lows monsters to arise from the inner darkness of mind. Goya's menacing cat and the rising clouds of owls and bats glowing in light and dark are lineal descendants of the beasts of medieval art.

Instead of merely threatening human life, as in Los Ca­prichos, the monsters take over entirely in Goya's final series, Los Disparates (The Follies), engraved between 1813 and 1819. The ultimate horror of Goya's imagination seethes through the series of dark frescoes the artist painted with fierce strokes on the walls of his own house from 1820 to 1822, depicting a universe dominated by unreason and terror, and making cruel mock of human­ity.

One of Goya's rare references to Classical mythology illus­trates the most savage of Greek legends. Saturn Devouring one of his Sons is an allegory of Time which engulfs us all. The glaring, mindless deity holds with colossal hands the body of his helpless son, from which he has torn and is chewing the head and the right arm - all indicated with brushstrokes of an unimagined ferocity.

Now nearing eighty, the great painter was not to live long with these creatures of his despairing imagination. After the resto­ration of a reactionary monarchic government in 1823, he left for France and died in exile.

Make sure you know how to pronounce the following words:

Francisco Goya [fr{nPsÖskou Pgoj@]; duchess [Pdö¶is]; Alba [P{lb@]; Daudet [Pd@udei]; Saturn [Ps{týn]; parody [Pp{r@di]; bayonet [Pbei@nit]; malevolent [m@Plev@l@nt]; nocturnal [nokPtýnl]; demonic [dÖPmonik]; caprices [k@PprÖsiz]; lineal [Plini@l]

NOTES

Family of Charles IV - "Групповой портрет семьи короля Карла IV"

Maja Desnuda - "Маха обнаженная"

The Third of May, 1808, at Madrid: The Shooting on Prin­cipe Pio Mountain - "Расстрел испанских повстанцев францу­зами в ночь на 3 мая 1808 г."

Los Caprichos (The Caprices) - "Каприччос"

Los Disparates (The Follies) - "Диспаратес"

Saturn Devouring one of his Sons - "Сатурн, пожирающий одного из своих сыновей"

TASKS

I. Read the text. Make sure you understand it. Mark the fol­lowing statements true or false.

1. Goya's portraits of the royal court were influenced by Van Dyck.

2. The Family of Charles IV, painted in 1799, is an inspired parody of Velazquez's Las Meninas.

3. In 1786 Goya made several series of etching-aquatints.

4. In 1815 after the expulsion of the French from Spain the liberal government commissioned Goya a painting.

5. When Reason sleeps monsters arise from the inner dark­ness of mind.

6. The monarchy was restored in Spain in 1828.

II. How well have you read? Can you answer the following questions?

1. Was Goya a lifelong rebel against artistic and intellectual straitjackets? What artistic trend did Goya represent?

2. What is Goya's supreme achievement in portraiture? How many figures are portrayed in this portrait? How are the king and the queen depicted? How was this portrait characterised by Alfonce Daudet? What did Goya want to express by this portrait?

3. What is one of the most delightful paintings of the female nude in history? Is there any other version of this picture? How was the nude explained?

4. In what painting did Goya denounce the inhumanity of war? What does this work of art represent? How is the firing squad treated? How are the victims depicted?

5. What is represented in The Caprices? What is pictured in the first section? What does the introductory print of the second section show? What did Goya paint on the walls of his own house?

6. What does one of Goya's rare references to Classical my­thology illustrate? What does this work of art symbolise?

III. i. Give Russian equivalents of the following phrases:

the greatest artistic genius; at the turn of the century; the supreme achievement in portraiture; an inspired parody; a sketch­ier version of the picture; an unconventional portrait; to commis­sion a painting; a firing squad; helpless victims; brushstrokes of an unimagined ferocity; an example of "social protest" in art; etching-aquatints; denounce the inhumanity of war; lineal descendants; references to Classical mythology.

ii. Give English equivalents of the following phrases:

офорт с акватинтой; пример "социального протеста" в ис­кусстве; прямые потомки; ссылки на классическую мифологию; высшее достижение портретной живописи; беспомощные жерт­вы; на рубеже веков; нетрадиционный портрет; энергичные маз­ки; стрелковое подразделение; гениальный художник; осудить жестокость войны; заказать картину; рабочая версия картины.

iii. Make up sentences of your own with the given phrases.

iv. Arrange the following in the pairs of synonyms.

a) ferocity; lineal; parody; supreme; squad; commission; achievement; monster; evil;

b) satire; order; immoral; viciousness; hereditary; beast; exqui­site; unit; feat.

IV. Here are descriptions of some of Goya's works of art. Match them up to the titles given below.

1. This painting is the earliest explicit example of "social pro­test" in art.

2. Goya unmasked these people as evil.

3. The first section, dealing with events from daily life, is sur­passed by the second, devoted to fantastic events.

4. The monsters take over entirely.

5. This work of art is an allegory of Time which engulfs us all.

6. This picture is an unconventional portrait of the duchess of Alba.

a. Maja Desnuda

b. Saturn Devouring one of his Sons

c. Los Disparates (The Follies)

d. The Third of May, 1808, at Madrid: The Shooting on Prin­cipe Pio Mountain

e. Los Caprichos (The Caprices)

f. Family of Charles IV

V. Summarize the text.

VI. Translate the text into English.

Франсиско Гойя, величайший художник Испании, работал на рубеже XVIII и XIX вв. Придворный живописец испанского короля Гойя, чтобы скрыть истинный смысл своих произведений, был вынужден прибегать к аллегориям. В знаменитой серии офортов "Каприччос" художник изобразил кошмарный мир чу­довищ и уродов. "Каприччос" включает 80 листов. Это обвини­тельный акт церкви, дворянству, абсолютизму - миру зла, лице­мерия и фанатизма.

Значительное место в творчестве Гойи занимают портреты. В них наиболее ярко проявился блестящий талант живописца. В одних портретах Гойя сумел показать красоту людей богатой духовной жизни. В других - мастер изобличил моральное паде­ние стоящих у власти людей. Таков "Групповой портрет короля Карла IV".

В период борьбы испанцев против наполеоновского втор­жения Гойя создал одно из наиболее выдающихся своих произ­ведений - "Расстрел испанских повстанцев французами в ночь на 3 мая 1808 г.", в котором изобразил трагическую развязку мадридского восстания и раскрыл могучий дух непокоренного народа.

Искусство Гойи предваряло романтизм - новое худо­жественное направление в западноевропейском искусстве.

VII. Topics for discussion.

1. Goya's portraits.

2. Goya's engravings.

3. Goya as a forerunner of Romanticism.

UNIT VI DELACROIX (1798-1863)

Eugene Delacroix was one of the leading French and Euro­pean painters for more than a generation. He was a real Roman­tic - solitary, moody, imaginative, profoundly emotional. Al­though Delacroix admired Italian art and wanted to go to Italy, he never went there; his journeys were to England, Belgium, Holland, Spain and North Africa. His life was marked by few external events. His real life, of great intensity, was lived on the canvas. "What is most real in me," he wrote, "are the illusions I create with my painting; the rest is shifting sand". In the course of his life he produced thousands of oil paintings and water-colours and innumerable drawings, and not long before his death he claimed that "in the matter of compositions I have enough for two human lifetimes; and as for projects of all kinds, I have enough for four hundred years." Delacroix wanted to paint scenes of emotional or physical violence. Often he drew his subjects from English poetry, especially Shakespeare and Byron, and from medieval history. He admired Beethoven, but his idol in music was "the divine Mozart". His lifelong loyalty to the sixteenth century Venetians and to Rubens constantly strengthened.

In the Bark of Dante, of 1822, Delacroix illustrates a mo­ment from the Divine Comedy in which the poet, accompanied by Virgil, is steered across the dark tides of the lake surrounding the city of Dis, attacked in the sulphurous dimness by damned souls rising from the waves against a background of towers and flames. In this painting Delacroix has broken up the pyramidal grouping, and is more concerned with effects of colour and of light and dark than with form. Some of the drops of water are painted in pure tones of red and green. Delacroix's basic compositional principle is a series of free curves, arising from the central area and always returning to it. This painting was highly praised.

Delacroix's next major work the Massacre at Chios, of 1824, was not easily accepted. The subject was an incident from the Greek wars of liberation against the Turks, which had excited the sympathies of Romantic spirit everywhere. The foreground is scattered with bodies. The neobaroque composition is diffused in De­lacroix's centrifugal curves, which part to display the distant slaughter and conflagration. The observer's sympathies are sup­posed to be with the sufferings of the Greeks, but their rendering is not convincing. The expressions tend to become standardised; the head of the young woman at the lower left almost repeats that of the dead mother at the lower right. This picture was called the "massacre of painting." The colour shows a richness and vibrancy not visible in French painting since the Rococo. He brought this huge picture to Paris for the Salon of 1824, and before the exhibi­tion opened he took it down and repainted it in tones emulating those, he found in Constable. From here on, Delacroix's interest in colour was great. He investigated colour contrasts on the canvas and in nature and derived a law - "the more contrast the greater the force."