регистрация / вход

Patient Assited Suicide Whose Example Should Be

Patient Assited Suicide: Whose Example Should Be F Essay, Research Paper Patient Assisted Suicide:Whose example should be followed? There are many different methods of approaching patients facing the end of their lives. Since technology has increased the ability to sustain life longer, patient assisted suicide has become an increasingly more popular avenue for doctors to explore.

Patient Assited Suicide: Whose Example Should Be F Essay, Research Paper

Patient Assisted Suicide:Whose example should be followed? There are many different methods of approaching patients facing the end of their lives. Since technology has increased the ability to sustain life longer, patient assisted suicide has become an increasingly more popular avenue for doctors to explore. This topic, since it deals with the power over life and death, touches on some of the deepest of human feelings. The argument over whose or which approach is most viable can become a heated one and could never be solved with one broad stroke since it deals with individuals on such an intimate level. Both Dr. Jack Kevorkian and Dr. Timothy Quill have there own views on which methods are correct, some of their views are similar and some are quite different. Both doctors agree that certain people at the end of their lives shouldn’t have to suffer any more than they have to, but they differ in the methods in which lead up to the decision process of choosing euthanasia or not. The belief that individuals facing terminal illnesses and or certain death in a short period of time should have the “right to die with as much control and dignity as possible” is shared by both Kevorkian and Quill (Quill 434). There are many cases in which people become sick and life becomes an endless episode phasing between unconsciousness and severe pain. There are also cases in which an individual becomes diagnosed with a disease with no definite cure and faces a road of painful treatment and emotional heartache . One example of this was Diane’s case. Diane was one of Dr. Quills patients who was diagnosed with “acute myelomonocytic leukemia”, a disease with a 25% survival rate with treatment and certain death in at most a few months without treatment (Quill 434). This disease is very painful to say the least. She was faced with the decision between a painful treatment process or death. Diane chose to let the disease run its course, this way she would be able to say her final good-byes to her family. Her only worry was that in the final stages of her death, would she be able to control herself, or would she slip away in agony. To avoid this she asked Dr. Quill if he would give her a prescription for barbiturates so that when the end was near she would be able to control her death. At first, Quill was apprehensive about her decision, but after careful thought he decided that assisting in her suicide would be the most beneficial course of action for her and her family (Quill 437). He realized that the treatment of the leukemia would be very painful and traumatic, and that the pain she was certain to face was unnecessary. His belief is that as a doctor, it is his responsibility to serve his patients in whatever way he feels most beneficial. He states his opinion most clearly when he says: “The Hippocratic oath really has two dimensions. One is to preserve life and the other is to relieve human suffering. Usually you are trying to do both but in end of life care you take relief of suffering as your priority, and you may use methods that may indirectly shorten life. People have a sense of who they are and what’s important in life and want to die with that in tact.”(Quill 138) It seems as though the essence of his work is to maintain an individual’s quality of life even if it means death. In Diane’s case, he risked his career and a possible jail sentence in order to make sure that he helped her in whatever way was best, and so he would be able to live with himself. Dr. Kevorkian shares the belief that a patient should in certain cases be allowed to chose assisted suicide if it means that they will avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. He has had far more cases of patient assisted suicide than Dr. Quill has, but their reasons are similar. Recently one of Kevorkian’s cases was featured on “DateLine”, a news program, in which a man named Thomas Youks was suffering from Lou Gehrig’s disease. He called upon Dr. Kevorkian because his disease was causing him a lot of pain and he was afraid that he was going to choke himself. His condition made it hard to eat, hard to sleep and hard to breath, for Tom Youks every minute of life was a struggle. Dr. Kevorkian talked with him and his family and made sure that assisted suicide was what they wanted this way he couldn’t be implicated. They all agreed so Tom said his good-byes and slipped peacefully away after receiving the lethal medicine from Dr. Kevorkian. Similar to Dr. Quill, Doctor Kevorkian believed that this type of situation called for few options other that assisted suicide.

Though Both Doctors agree that Assisted suicide is a viable option in certain circumstances, their methods of care before the decision is quite different. Dr. Quill states in an interview from people magazine that he believes firmly in the doctor patient relationship. “Everything I [Quill] do has to do with the long haul and careful assessment and making sure this [assisted suicide] is the last resort and that every patient has good access to hospice care and palliative care”(Quill 138). Dr. Quill feels that a doctor should first care for the patient and try to make them as comfortable as possible, then if the situation truly calls for something else, assisted suicide is brought into the picture. This care is not only for the patient but is extended to the patient’s family. It is also important to attend to both the psychological needs of the patient, not just the physical. In the case of Diane he had developed a relationship with her and her family. He was in the proper position to aid in their decision because he knew them. He also believes that it is important to inform the patient of all their options. He is a friend to those he helps not just a doctor, that is what is important.Dr. Kevorkian on the other hand lacks in almost all of these aspects. He meets his patients for the most part by their contacting him to perform assisted suicide. He only spends about a week with them. In Tom’s case he was with him only a few short days. According to Dr. Quill “he has frequently acted without knowing people in even the most superficial way. He has no experience in end of life care He is a pathologist, so he doesn’t have the skills in pain management and psychological assessment”(Quill 138). Dr. Kevorkian is not involved in the decision process, but only in the act itself. It is this that truly separates the two doctors. Though both Dr. Quill and Dr. Kevorkian are active supporters in patient assisted suicide, I believe that Dr. Quill is everything that Dr. Kevorkian is not. I believe that Dr. Kevorkian leaves out the most important part of the process of assisted suicide. It is the care and true assessment of all the aspects involved that is missing from Jack Kevorkian. When it comes to having a figure in the spotlight I feel that it should be Timothy Quill not Jack Kevorkian. If patient assisted suicide were to be maid illegal, Dr. Quill should be it’s model, not Jack Kevorkian. This is true because the most important aspect of the process is the comfort, care and information that leads up to the decision, not just the number of patients that you see.

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий