Nafta For Canada Essay, Research Paper
1994 the year NAFTA had become effective, delegates from three Countries (Canada, United States and Mexico) had signed a free trade agreement in December of 1992. The leaders of these nations signed the agreement with the hopes of prosperity. Isn’t ironic that five years later we are starting to see that NAFTA was not beneficial but in fact the opposite. Since then NAFTA has ignited fierce opposition from labour and environmental groups. They have feared that many jobs would be lost either to the U.S.A or Mexico. Currently the country taking most of Canada’s work force is the U.S with their grip on technology they are in fact luring Canadians, the media has called this the “Brain Drain”. NAFTA has also created environmental issues such as a four-lane highway just for trucks, to make it easier to transport products to one side of the border to the other, which may or may not be built. But if NAFTA intended to be a good for the nation then why has it turned out to be so bad, would it be in Canada’s best interest that NAFTA is re-signed.
How does the brain drain relate to NAFTA?
The brain drain is caused when companies take our highly trained out of Canada and work for them (usually in the U.S). it also makes it easier for companies to move from one country to the next.
The brain drain is a Canadian problem. Why are Canadians leaving for the U.S.
1. Better Money
The low Canadian dollar Vs. the high American dollar, also the higher wages in the States is a big incentive for moving.
(e.g. A worker for Nortel gets paid $48,000 Can or if he works in the U.S he will get paid $53,000 US. Same Job different pay)
But why do you get paid differently for the same job. It is fairly simple companies in the U.S get tax breaks which allows them to pay their employee’s more.
2. More opportunity
There is more opportunity for success in America then in Canada because America government has past legislation that makes it easier to immigrate into the country and become a citizen and once you’ve become a citizen you have access to a great amount of money to start a business.
This is the most important any employee wants is appreciation. No person would be happy in a job where they are not appreciated. That is the main reason why people leave for America.
What are possible solutions for the brain drain?
v The Canadian government should give more money to entrepreneurs, sort of like a fund. The Government would chip in around 30% to 40%, the entrepreneur would chip would put in 20% to 30% and the rest a bank would loan out. This would make it easier for someone to start up a business.
v The Canadian Government should give tax breaks to large Business if they move here. This will work in Canada’s favor because of our low dollar, it will encourage companies to come here instead of staying in the U.S. Also it will be cheaper and more cost productive.
v Make it easier to immigrate to Canada from the U.S. This will increase the work force and also the amount of businesses.
v The B.C Government should try to make Vancouver the next Silicon Valley. Vancouver already has a lot of technology companies there, but if the Canadian Government implements the three previous solutions this may be a reality.
Since NAFTA was established a lot of people lost their jobs mainly because the companies they had worked for had left for the U.S or the company started to restructure employee’s were downsized. Downsizing is another word for fired. In order for Canada to stay competitive, we must put a stop to the brain drain. By keeping our work force in Canada and also by increasing population. It would help the Canadian economy and also the unemployment rate.
NAFTA is not only affecting employment but also the environment. Canada has 9% of the earth’s land and also the biggest fresh water supply in the world. We must protect that from excess pollution, logging and fishing. But since NAFTA has come into effect, pollution levels have increased. There have also been plans to sell Canada’s water to foreign countries.
“Newfoundland, Which indicated in February it would support the Federal initiative, is now considering a water export project that would create employment in the job-poor province. Quebec wants to hold its own public inquiries before acting, and has spoken out against what it considers Ottawa’s interference in a provincial matter. It could be years before Quebec reaches a provincial policy, which will hold up the national pact indefinitely, federal officials said.”
“Aquaroute plans to export about 10,000 tons of water a month,
Mr. Barbeau said, adding that he sees no need for the company to obtain a government permit.”
“Aquaroute is at least the forth company in the past year to express interest in exporting water from Canada”
“A California company is suing Ottawa under the North American free-trade agreement for not being allowed to export water from British Columbia, and McCurdy group is moving ahead with its plans in Newfoundland”
“The federal government is concerned about the impact that bulk exports of water could have on trade and the environment.”
“Water sitting in a lake or river is considered a natural resource but not a good or product, so trade rules don’t apply. But once someone packages the fresh water and sells it, it becomes a good.”
The Canadian Government is in a no win situation. If they say no then they will be compromising jobs and if they say yes then they will be compromising the environment.
What are possible solutions?
v The Canadian Government should do tests on the water. To see what is a safe amount water to remove before any environmental damage is done.
v Don’t sell the water. Until NAFTA is renegotiated then the Canadian government can be the only one to sell Canadian water.
Another environmental issue is logging, since NAFTA has been in a effect more and more logging companies have started. There is the biggest environmental issue in Canada, trees produce oxygen without that human’s and most of the other animals on the earth would die. The Canadian government acted quickly and past legislation stating that the logging companies must plat seedling for every mature tree they cut down. But with logging the trucks are the ones doing the most polluting. By burning diesel fuel they are spreading toxic fumes into the forrest.
v Currently we can look for cheaper less polluting ways of fuel. Such as electricity but currently, a truck will need a lot of electricity in order to pick up large, heavy trees.
v Also find other mean of wood, such as synthetic or maybe recycled wood
Another main concern is over fishing. Over fishing is when a ship exceeds the maximum amount of fish in one day. If ships over-fish then there will be a major shortage of fish then there will have serious consequences. Such as the obvious, as other type of wild life will die, due to lack of food. (eg. Seals eat a lot of fish. But if there is a shortage food, they will die slowly.)
Possible Solutions for over fishing
v The Canadian Government should pass strict rules, stating that any company caught over-fishing. Would immediately have the boat confiscated and would have to pay very high fines and they would never be allowed on Canadian water for period of time.
v The government should also set up police boats patrolling the water at all time.
v The Canadian population could also help by not eating as much fish. Find other means protein.
Canada is known world wide for our clean air, our forrest’s and our beautiful lakes. Canadians must protect it at all costs, and NAFTA isn’t helping much it is making the situation a lot worse. NAFTA has opened the doors for large U.S companies to come and destroy Canada. Unless Canada does not any action there will be a serious problem not just for Canada but the world. If Canada’s trees go then less oxygen will be produced and all animals’ not just humans need oxygen, without it we will all die. Selling Canada’s water is also a big mistake especially if it in a body of water that is being over fished. Those two mix are very serious and Canada can not take any chances.