Immigration Into Canada Essay, Research Paper
Immigration Into Canada
This paper is concerned with the recent wave of Hong Kong immigrants
into Vancouver. The stage is set for this discussion by first explaining some
background behind Canadian immigration policy and then discussing the history of
Chinese immigrants in Vancouver. From these discussions we are informed that
Canadian immigration policy was historically ethnocentric and only began to
change in the late 1960s. It was at this point that we see a more multicultural
group of immigrants into our nation. The history of Chinese immigration in
Vancouver, and for that matter, Canada is not positive one. The experiences and
prejudices which were developed over 100 years ago still colours the way in
which we view one another.
The recent wave of Hong Kong immigrants began in the 1970s. This group
is different from most others before it because of it’s scale and the fact that
they tend to be well-educated, affluent people. The result of their immigration
into Vancouver has been a booming economy and social tension. With greater
understanding and awareness on both sides we can alleviate the social tensions.
There is a school in Vancouver which is offering a four year immersion
programme to its students. That in itself is not highly unusual in our bilingual
nation, what is unusual is that the language of choice for the immersion
programme is not French, it is Mandarin. The programme was voted in by parents
who believed the Mandarin language to be more important to their children’s
futures in Vancouver than French. This situation shows quite effectively the
transition which is taking place in Canada’s third largest city. Vancouver is a
city which is consistently looking more and more to the Pacific Rim nations,
especially Hong Kong, for its economic and social connections.
Vancouver is the most asian Canadian city in outlook. At $1.3 Billion,
British Columbia accounts for the greatest Asian investment of all the provinces.
As the urban center of the province, Vancouver is the destination for most of
this capital. With an Asian population of over 18%, perhaps it is not so
surprising that so much Asian capital is invested in the city. The draw of
Vancouver for Asians has numerous reasons including, security, an opportunity to
continue business in Asia, and a feeling of welcome. The result is that the city
is being completely rebuilt with asian money. As a consequence of this influx,
all is not well, there are tensions within the city that have recently been
surfacing. Before entering into this discussion, however, it is important to
understand the context of immigration in Canada as well as the history of asian
immigration into our nation.
Jurisdiction over immigration is shared between the Federal and
Provincial governments. The Federal government is responsible for establishing
admission requirements while the provinces are becoming increasingly interested
in the selection of applicants and their settlement. The governments set out
numerous controls, including those over the ethnocultural composition of
incoming immigrants, the total number of immigrants admitted, the categories of
immigrants admitted, and the regional settlement of immigrants once they arrive.
History of Immigration in Canada
Historically, Canadian immigration policy has been consistently
ethnocentric. It was only recently that the Canadian government sought to
maintain a ?white’ society by selectively advertising abroad as well as granting
prospective applicants from Europe, the US, New Zealand, and Australia
preferential treatment. During the 1960s this distinction between preferred and
non-preferred contries was replaced with a points-system. Along with the new
points-system it was hoped that applicants from all countries and of all ethnic
origins were treated equally. The effects of this shift has been significant.
As can be seen in the above table, the majority of the immigrants arriving
before 1967 were of European background. From 1967 onward the flow of immigrants
has been internationalized.
Throughout the 20th Century the Canadian government has set targets for
the number of immigrant entries based upon economic criteria. Periods of
encouragement have included the early decades of this century along with the
reconstruction era of Post World War II. The 30s, 40s and the recession of the
early 80s have been periods during which the national government has discouraged
immigration. At times, economic concerns have given way to humanitarian ones
such as during the Soviet invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia, and during
the Vietnamese refugee crisis of the 70s.
Generally, however, Canadian immigration targets have reflected the rate
of economic expansion and employment. An exception to this rule was during the
latter part of the 1980s. Worry over the declining fertility rate and our ageing
population led the federal government to raise its annual targets despite high
unemployment. Most recently, under economic pressures, the most recent Liberal
government once again lowered the immigration level.
The Geography of Immigration
There have also been attempts at controlling the geography of immigrant
settlement. The Federal government stated that one of the primary goals of
immigration is to, “foster the development of a strong and viable economy and
the prosperity of all regions in Canada.” Immigration in our country has been
seen as a means of promoting economic development in less prosperous regions, as
well as supporting heartland areas.
While the government has attempted to influence the geography of
immigrant settlement, they have been able to achieve few results. Most
immigrants still gravitate to areas of demonstrated economic growth. Immigrants
have avoided the Atlantic provinces, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan while they have
been attracted to Alberta (mainly during the economic boom of the 70s), British
Columbia, and especially Ontario. In the table below we are able to clearly see
that, as a percentage of their own population, Ontario, B.C. and Alberta
dominate the remaining provinces with their share of the immigrant population.
An even greater degree of concentration is apparent when urban
destinations are considered. In 1991 Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver accounted
for 60% of the intended destinations stated by those immigrants arriving into
Nearly 80% of immigrants intended to settle in just ten cities. The
Table below shows the intended urban destination of immigrants to Canada in 1991.
City Total Immigrants Percentage
Toronto 63,891 27.7
Montreal 46,300 20.1
Vancouver 26,361 11.4
Top Three 136,552 59.2
Mississauga 9,082 3.9
Ottawa-Hull 7,977 3.5
Edmonton 7,629 3.3
Calgary 7,307 3.2
Winnipeg 5,173 2.2
London 3,752 1.6
Hamilton 3,745 1.6
Top Ten 181,217 78.5
Remainder 49,564 21.5
Of all immigrants, those entering under the business category exhibited the
most clustered pattern of settlement. 80% of this group chose to live in either
Toronto, Montreal, or Vancouver. The following table breaks down the intended
urban destination of business immigrants to Canada in 1991.
City Business Immigrants Percentage
Toronto 582 15.7
Montreal 1102 29.7
Vancouver 1,294 34.9
Top Three 2,978 80.3
Edmonton 86 2.3
Calgary 79 2.1
Winnipeg 72 1.9
Hamilton 37 1.0
Mississauga 31 0.8
Ottawa-Hull 19 0.5
London 12 0.3
Top Ten 3,314 89.3
Remainder 396 10.7
The first major influx of the chinese into Canada was during the 1850s and
1860s, when they were lured to this country by the promised bounty of the Fraser
River gold rush. By 1860, the new colony of British Columbia counted amongst its
population 4,000 Asians but their numbers tended to fluctuate according to the
prosperity of the mines. The greatest period of chinese immigration occured
between 1881-1884 when over 17,000 chinese came to work on the CPR.
Pressured by the railway companies, who viewed the chinese as reliable,
cheap labour, the federal government vetoed any attempts to halt their entrance
into the country until the railway was completed. With the final completion of
the railway chinese immigration remained in flux by continued to grow in
History of Discrimination
The chinese were always discriminated against, they were consistently
treated as outcasts. The chinese immigrant was thought, by mainstream Canadian
society to be “taking” jobs away from whites at half the “acceptable” wages.
This was said even though the chinese usually were employed in jobs which the
majority of whites thought were beneath them. For instance, many chinese
immigrants employed themselves by providing laundry services in mining camps, or
in cities. It was at this point that the chinese began a tradition of
entrepreneurship in Canada which they still maintain today.
Fig. 5 is a picture cut out of a Vancouver newspaper at the turn of the
century entitled “The Unanswerable Argument”. It essentially epitomizes the
cities views of itself and those of the chinese immigrant.
In 1885 discrimination against the chinese received official sanction with
the implementation of the “head tax”. Originally this tax was set at $10 but, by
1893 it had grown to $500. It never had the desired effect of stopping chinese
immigration, but it certainly slowed it down considerably. In 1923 the
discrimination continued as the federal government barred all immigration from
China; a provision which was not lifted until 1947. Until 1947 the chinese were
also prevented from practicing medicine, law, or becoming members of any other
professions. It was only in the late 40s that chinese/canadian citizens were
even allowed to vote in Canada. The numerous restrictions placed upon this group
of people ensured that chinese communities were made up of bachelors as only
single adult men could afford to immigrate.
From the time that Vancouver was incorporated in 1886 there was a
geographical reference to the racial category “chinese” at Carall and Dupont (E.
Pender) streets (indicated in Fig. 4 as Chinatown). One-hundred forty-three
merchants founded associations and ran businesses in the area, usually with
attached homes, to service the chinese immigrant population of 2,053 in 1901. At
that time the community included over 1,500 labourers. Many of the individuals
in this district depended upon chinese bosses to find them contract work in
laundries, saw mills, brickyards and canneries. Others worked within the
community in construction, restaurants and tailoring firms.
Ottawa had seen an economic interest in the idea of a cheap “chinese” type
of labour and set a precedent for widespread economic subordinization of the
chinese. Vancouver’s Bell-Irving said in 1901, “It is the destiny of the white
man to be worked for by inferior races.” In 1885 proprietor R. Dunsmuir said
that in his mines the “chinese are put to the type of work that best suits them
- ordinary, manual labour.”
Local white workers were equally willing to believe in the idea of a unique
“chinese” type of labour. They even resorted to violence on February 24, 1886
when 300 whites invaded a camp of chinese workers in the West End to rid the
city of “unfair competition”. With tacit approval of local police and officials,
the white labourers attacked the camp and sent the chinese residents of Dupont
st. to New Westminster. The provincial government stepped in at this point and
sent special constables from Victoria to restore law and order.
The rioters were eventually brought to trial. The banished chinese returned
from New Westminster and the West End contract was completed. Many of the
labourers gravitated to the original Dupont st. settlement. It was only the
senior state interaction which allowed the chinese to settle peacefully in a
somewhat reluctant Vancouver. This history of chinese settlement in Vancouver is
extremely crucial to the understanding of the present situation as it still
plays in the psyche of these two groups in their daily interactions in the city.
There has been a shift in chinese immigration over the past thirty years.
No longer are the majority of chinese immigrants poor, single-adult males from
rural farming communities in mainland China; today, the dominant chinese
immigrants are middle to upper-class, generally educated, urbanites from Hong
Some of the changes which were talked about earlier in this paper made to
the Canadian immigration policy have encouraged more middle-class/ professional
immigration in order to boost Canada’s skill profile and to help generate
employment. These changes have caused a shift in the orientation of the
immigrant population and capital flows into Canada.
In particular, the countries of the pacific rim have risen in relative
importance as source regions for both international finance and migrants into
Canada. Fig. 7 shows the transition in the importance of certain countries as
sources of immigrants. The table shows all immigrants in Canada and compares
them to the most recent immigrants in the country. One can see from this table
that Pacific Rim nations, especially Hong Kong, have contributed the most
immigrants in recent years.
These new immigrants are not following the traditional pattern of chinese
settlement in Vancouver. No longer is Chinatown the destination of chinese
immigrants into Vancouver. Since the 1970s the new wave of immigrants has been
moving out of the central city, usually skipping it altogether and into the
suburbs. The fastest growing chinese communities throughout Canadian cities are
no longer found in downtown’s but rather on the fringes. In Vancouver, this
translates into a booming Chinese population in such suburbs as New Westminster
and Richmond. Richmond’s population, for example, is made up of over one-third
recent immigrants from Hong Kong.
As was shown in Fig. 4, Vancouver is the destination for the majority of
the business-class immigrants. Over 30% of all immigrants entering the country
under this category are destined for Vancouver, that is greater than any other
single city in Canada.
According to Roslyn Kunin, author of a government report on immigrant
investment, $3Billion was brought into Canada by business immigrants between
1986 and 1991. The majority of that money came from Asia. For those five years,
business immigrant financial investment amounted to 10% of all business sector
Impressive as those numbers are on their own, they are even higher for
British Columbia, where, in 1992, a full 25% of the $4Billion invested in the
province came from Hong Kong alone. Thanks to these new immigrants, the province
enjoyed a growth of 3.3% in 1992, far exceeding the 0.7% growth of the rest of
Canada. The Hong Kong Bank of Canada, after purchasing the Bank of British
Columbia and Lloyds Bank of Canada, has become the country’s largest foreign
bank with assets of $12.6Billion. Its most profitable branch: Vancouver
Why is it that their are so many recent immigrants from Hong Kong? Fears of
an uncertain future for the country after the reigns of power are given over to
the People’s Republic of China are the primary driving force. Many of the
affluent members of Hong Kong society fear that what they have worked for may be
taken away, they fear political, social and economic repression. The calming
voices coming out of Beijing have not convinced many Hong Kong residents. China
is not trusted. Also, the political and economic climate of the territory have
driven many people away. Emigration has long been a feature of Hong Kong life
and Canada has been, and continues to be, a favourite destination for the
The Case of Toronto
Vancouver is not alone in the changes taking place within its city.
Toronto’s Chinese population is also decentralizing. No longer is its Chinese
population centered upon an area in the downtown core called Chinatown. Canada’s
largest Chinese community is now found in six centers throughout the Toronto
region. Three of these centers are within the city, while three are without, but
the growth is in the suburbs – Scarborough, Mississauga, North York.
The transition is from a central, condensed Chinatown area into more
sparsely populated North American style neighborhoods. Chinese have been more
slow to move to the suburbs than other ethnic groups, mainly due to the
extremely harsh racism which was outlined earlier. The Chinese, it is thought,
needed Chinatown to protect themselves, something which, arguably, is not
necessary any more.
The change in structure of this new immigrant group as well as their
location amongst the community has caused many problems to surface. Vancouver
tends tobe one of the most popular destinations for new Hong Kong immigrants,
especially for the business-minded.
Why is Vancouver so popular? There are three core reasons for this
popularity 1)The provincial and civic governments have given clear signals to
the Hong Kong community that the city is open for business (i.e. the sale of
expo lands to Li Ka Shing). There has been a marked shift in view by policy
makers in the region away from the East where Europe and Central Canada lie,
towards the West, and the pacific rim nations. 2)Asian entrepreneurs are able to
do business in Vancouver around the clock. Vancouver is located in such a way as
to be in perfect position for Asian entrepreneurs, it is almost exactly halfway
between Tokyo and London. As a result businessmen can conduct business in London
in the morning, the west coast in the middle of the day, and Tokyo or Hong Kong
in the evening. 3)Asian businessmen also are begining to see how they can take
advantage of Nafta. By settling in Vancouver they are taking advantage of the
first two benefits and possibly using this third one. By immigrating into Canada
and ensuring that the Canadian content of the business is 51% or greater the
businessmen can take full advantage of Nafta benefits.
Social Strains As Vancouver enjoys the economic benefits of record levels of
immigration, the city of 1.6 million finds itself straining to accomodate the
needs of an increasingly multicultural population. Citizens of longer standing,
meanwhile, are asking other questions: as the face of the city changes, whose
values will prevail, those of traditional Vancouver – or those of the newcomers?
Vancouver is a city which still evokes strong British heritage, the visibly
changing population might prompt an even deeper question, one that has profound
meaning for the entire country. As the numbers of Canadians of non-European
origin increases, who are “we” anyways?
In contrast to the immigrants of past decades, most of whom arrived in
their new home with little money and a willingness to take any work that was
offered, many of the most recent newcomers to the city, particularly the roughly
one-fifth who arrive from Hong Kong, have both wealth and high expectations. As
investors and consumers their growing presence has extremely visible
The new economic immigrants arrive in Vancouver flush with cash. They are
rich. At the Chinatown branch of the Hongkong Bank of Canada, half of the 20,000
clients have $3Million deposits. Ready to invest, they arrive in a city with
little industry to invest in. As a result they turn towards real estate. Over
the course of 1993 the real estate prices in Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy, two
communities popular with new chinese immigrants, rose over 40%. The following
figure shows examples of the “monster homes” built in Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy
on typical lots and compares them to examples of the more traditional homes.
In late 1992, Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy were neighborhoods at the centre
of a heated debate over the right of new purchasers to level existing homes and
replace them with much larger dwellings that residents believed to be out of
place. In a district where many long-standing homeowners are avid gardeners, it
did not help that many builders felled full-grown trees in order to accomodate
the larger scale homes, and replaced greenery with multiple parking spaces.
“There is suffering going on in the neighborhood. People are emotionally
exhausted,” says Johanna Albrecht, chairwoman of the West Kerrisdale Residents’
Association tree committee about the greenery issue. At the same time, the
owners of the offending homes, many recently arrived immigrants from Hong Kong,
insisted that they had met existing zoning rules and had a cleara right to do as
they wished with their property.
After a series of emotional public hearings during early 1993, a compromise
was reached. In exchange for permission to build houses larger than anywhere
else in Vancouver, City Hall now insists that builders of new homes take into
account the style of the dwellings on either side. While city hall thinks that
this solution is working, many residents are not so positive.
To be honest with ourselves, we must begin by admitting that not everyone
rejoices in the “changing face” of our country. Nor is it the case that Canada
opens its arms equally and impartially to all corners of the earth, or looks
positively opun all of their cultural differences. Every Canadian nows that such
preferences exist; the task of a nation which is truly commtted to human rights
is to defy its own prejudices.
Discriminatory attitudes and acts are not necessarily aimed at the least
advantaged. 1995 was witness to several cases of vocal resentment directed
against relatively affluent Asian minorities in cities such as Toronto and
Vancouver. The cause of the disturbance is that some of these people have moved
into neighborhoods with different ethnic backgrounds. The increased Asian
visibility created a backlash, which in this case took the form of suggestions
that the community was too “concentrated” or “exclusive,” or insufficiently
“divers.” Perhaps what was most positive about these outbursts was that when
people began to calm down things usually led to a greater dialogue and a
determination by all sides to do better.
For instance, a story about “overly prominent” Chinese-Canadians in
Vancouver led to the publication of some advice in the city’s Ming Pao Daily
News suggesting that Canadians of Chinese origin might do more to avoid raising
intercultural resentments and to examine their own cultural and racial
prejudices. Perhaps this is good advice for all Canadians, especially in
Vancouver in Toronto.
One might ask whether the ideal of a color-blind and ethnically harmonious
society would not be better served by putting such differences to the side
rather than in-graining them through official hyphenization. If we are all
Canadians together, why do we continue to qualify our geographic identifiers
with words such as White, Black, French, Asian, German, Muslim, or Allophone?
Albrecht, Johanna. Telephone Interview. 22 March 1996.
Chong, Abner. Telephone Interview. 23 March 1996.
Employment and Immigration Canada. Immigration Statistics 1991. Ottawa:
Ministry of Supply and Services, 1992.
Statistics Canada. Immigration and Citizenship. 1991 Census of Canada,
Catalogue No. 93-316.
Anderson, Kay J. “Community Formation in Official Context: Residential
Segregation and the ?Chinese’ in Early Vancouver” Canadian Geographer
38, No. 3 (1994), 354-356.
Anderson, Kay J. “The Idea of Chinatown: The Power of Place and Institutional
Practice in the Making of a Racial Category” Annals of the Association of
American Geographers, 77(4), 1987, 580-598.
Ford, Ashley. “Canadian Land Boom Goes West” Far Eastern Economic Review Mar.
29, 1994, 44-45.
Fung, May. “Passport to a New Beginning” The Hong Kong Standard Feb. 4,
1996, Special Report.
Gold, Kerry. “Proposed Legislation Would Protect Most Trees” The Vancouver
Courier, Jan 10 1996, 2.
Gorrie, Peter. “Farewell to Chinatown” Canadian Geographic v. 111 (Aug/Sept,
Hiebert, Daniel. “Canadian Immigration: Policy, Politics, Geography” Canadian
Geographer 38, No. 3 (1994) 254-258.
LeCorre, Phillippe. “Canada’s Hong Kong” Far Eastern Economic Review Feb.
10, 1994, 36-37.
Lee, Wei-Na and Tse, David K. “Becoming Canadian: Understanding How Hong
Kong Immigrants Change their Consumption” Pacific Affairs v. 67
(Spring, 1994), 70-95.
Majury, Niall. “Signs of the Times: Kerrisdale, a Neighborhood in Transition”
The Canadian Geographer 38, No. 3 (1994) 265-270.
McMartin, Peter. “Learning to Fit In” The Vancouver Sun Feb 10, 1996, D5.
Nash, Alan. “Some Recent Developments in Canadian Immigration Policy”
Canadian Geographer 38, No. 3 (1994) 258-261.
The Economist v. 336 (Aug. 26, 1995), 40.
Todd, Douglas. “Immigration is About More than Money” The Vancouver SunJan.
20, 1996, D11.
Vibert, Dermot. “Asian Migration to Canada in Historical Context” Canadian
Geographer 38, No. 3 (1994), 352-354.
Wood, Chris. “Lessons of Vancouver” Maclean’s Feb 7, 1994, 26-31.
“Yacht People” The Economist v. 311 (Apr. 22, 1989), 42.