Смекни!
smekni.com

Gays A Struggle For Acceptance Essay Research (стр. 2 из 2)

on how to be and act and deviance from this ideal, would cause the ARussian

Bear@ to invade the American peace loving neighborhoods. I think homosexuals

were used as scapegoats and were a minority that could be sacrificed for the

governments proclaimed Agood@ of the nation.

SOURCES: – The American Record; volume II: since 1865, by William

Graebner & Leonard Richards, McGraw-Hill, Inc. – Making History; The

Struggle for Gay and Lesbian Equal Rights 1945 – 1990, by Erik Marcus,

HarperCollins Publishers

INTERESTING AND MORE DETAILED EXCERPTS FROM INTERNET SOURCES FOR FURTHER

READING:

The Stonewall Inn, (named after the Confederate General ‘Stonewall’ Jackson),

was a gay bar (said to be sleazy and Mafia-run) at 51-53 Christopher Street just

east of Sheridan Square in New York’s Greenwich Village. On the night of 27/28th.

June, 1969, a police inspector and seven other officers from the Public Morals

Section of the First Division of the New York City Police Department arrived

shortly after midnight, served a warrant charging that alcohol was being sold

without a license, and announced that employees would be arrested. The patrons

were ejected from the bar by the police while others lingered outside to watch,

and were joined by passers-by. The arrival of the paddy wagons changed the mood

of the crowd from passivity to defiance. The first vehicle left without incident

apart from catcalls from the crowd. The next individual to emerge from the bar

was a woman in male costume who put up a struggle which galvanized the

bystanders into action. The crowd erupted into throwing cobblestones and bottles.

Some officers took refuge in the bar while others turned a fire hose on the

crowd. Police reinforcements were called and in time the streets were cleared.

During the day the news spread, and the following two nights saw further violent

confrontations between the police and gay people. The event was important less

for its intrinsic character than for the significance subsequently bestowed on

it. The Stonewall Rebellion was a spontaneous act of resistance to the police

harassment that had been inflicted on the homosexual community since the

inception of the modern vice squad in metropolitan police forces. It sparked a

new, highly visible, mass phase of political organization for gay rights that

far surpassed, semi-clandestine homophile movement of the 1950s and 1960s,

exemplified by the Mattachine Society. The Mattachine Society newsletter

described the rebellion as ‘the hairpin drop heard round the world’. The event

has been commemorated by a parade held each year in New York City on the last

Sunday in June, following a tradition that began with the first march on 29th.

June, 1970, and by parallel events throughout the United States.@

STONEWALL: THE HISTORICAL EVENT

The confrontations between demonstrators and police at The Stonewall Inn in

Greenwich Village over the weekend of June 27-29, 1969 are usually cited as the

beginning of the modern movement for Lesbian/Gay liberation. What might have

been a routine police raid on a bar patronized by homosexuals, became a signal

event which sparked a movement. The Stonewall riots have developed into the

stuff of myth, about which many of the most commonly held beliefs are probably

untrue. In 1969, it was illegal to operate any business catering to homosexuals

in New York City-as it still is, today in 1991, in many places in the United

States and elsewhere. The standard procedure was for the New York City police to

raid such establishments on a semi-regular basis, to arrest a few of the most

obvious ‘types’ and to fine the owners prior to letting business continue as

usual by the next evening. It has been suggested that the majority of the

patrons at the Stonewall Inn were black and Hispanic drag queens, but perhaps

the goddess has always valued these rare creatures much too highly to ever let

them become a majority. In fact, most of the patrons that evening were most

likely young, college-age white men expecting to spend the rest of their lives

in the quiet desperation of the middle-class closet. They knew that it was

reasonably safe to enter the Stonewall Inn precisely because there were a few

colored drag queens, butch bulldykes and others whose double-minority status

made them far more likely candidates for arrest; this gave everyone else time to

cover their faces and run for the nearest exit. After midnight June 27-28, 1969,

four men and two women from the New York Tactical Police Force called a raid on

The Stonewall Inn at 55 Christopher Street. After leaving the bar, many of the

patrons decided to wait around outside while the police dispatched the ‘usual

suspects’ into the vans. It is said that this was the first time where Lesbians

and Gay men fought back; in fact, there had already been several incidents in

both Los Angeles and New York where sizable groups of Gays had resisted arrest.

More to the point, the queens targeted for arrest had always fought back, alone

and unsupported as they were led time and again to the vans. What was unique

about Stonewall and gives it a resonance which continues to inspire today was

that it was perhaps the first time when Lesbians and Gay men as a group were

able to see beyond the lipstick and the high heels, beyond the skin color and

recognize the oppression which threatens us all. The greatest great myth

concerning the Stonewall riots is that it was a Lesbian/Gay event. It is likely

that many of those who began pitching pennies, then beer bottles, at the police

that night weren’t even homosexual. The only publicly reported arrest was a

straight folk singer who was appearing next door and who joined the melee after

leaving work. The streets of Greenwich Village were home to many young people

whose politics were defined by the blossoming anti-war movement, left-wing

political ideologies and the successes of the Women’s liberation and Black Civil

Rights movements. Like their Lesbian/Gay brothers and sisters, they were

prepared to recognize oppression and thus willing to respond to it. (Anyone who

thinks being able to see oppression is easy has to only remember the Clarence

Thomas confirmation hearings.) In all, some 300 to 400 people became involved

in the attempt to stop the arrests, erupting into violent protest. The police

and the bar owners, who were perceived to be part of the repressive system at

work, barricaded themselves inside the Stonewall Inn for protection. While they

awaited reinforcements, the crowd outside attempted to burn the bar down with

the cops inside. Eventually, a squadron of patrol cars arrived and chased the

crowd away from the bar, and then around the narrow village streets for several

hours. The following night, a new crowd assembled outside the Stonewall and

rioted when the police attempted to break it up. Provocative articles appearing

in the NY Post, Daily News and especially The Village Voice helped to

consolidate Gay willingness to fight back. Within a few days, representatives of

the Mattachine Society and the Daughters of Bilitis organized the city’s first

ever “Gay Power” rally in Washington Square. On July 27, 1969, speeches by

Martha Shelley and Marty Robinson were followed by a candlelight march to the

site of the Stonewall Inn. Five hundred people showed up, thought to have

included almost the entire ‘out-of-the-closet’ population of Lesbians and Gay

men in New York, as well as their supporters from the political left. The rest

as they say is history… STONEWALL: The Movement Before Stonewall, there were a

number of groups working for homosexual rights, ever since the concept had been

defined in nineteenth century Germany, home to the world’s first politically

organized movement. In the United States, since April 1965, Frank Kameny of

Washington, DC had been organizing Homosexual Reminder Days on the ellipse

across from the White House and at Independence Hall in Philadelphia. These were

sedate affairs of a few dozen picketers with the men in jackets and ties and the

Lesbians in skirts and dresses. Their principal demand was for civil service

protection and the right of homosexuals to hold government jobs. The New York

delegation that attended the July 4th picket in 1969, one week after Stonewall,

held hand and shouted down the other marchers. This was the last Homosexual

Reminder Day and a clear sign that the Stonewall riots had set something new in

motion. During the first year after Stonewall, a whole new generation of

organizations emerged, many identifying themselves for the first time as “Gay”

meaning not only a sexual orientation, but a radical new basis for self-

identification and with a sense of open political activism. Older groups such as

the Mattachine Society or the Westside Discussion Group whose members had used

first names or altogether fictitious ones to protect their identities soon made

way for the Gay Liberation Front and the various regional Gay Activists

Alliances. The vast majority of these new activists were under thirty, new to

political organizing and believed everything was possible. Many groups were

affiliated with specific colleges and universities, again with “Gay” replacing

“Homophile” in the names of most older groups and almost all new ones. By the

summer of 1970, groups in at least eight American cities were sufficiently

organized to schedule simultaneous events commemorating the Stonewall riots for

the last Sunday in June. The events varied from a highly political march of

three to five thousand in New York to a parade with floats for 1200 in Los

Angeles.

MATTACHINE SOCIETY

One of the earliest gay movement organizations in the USA. It began in Los

Angeles in 1950-51. Its name was given by the pioneer activist Harry Hay in

commemoration of the French medieval and Renaissance SociJtJ Mattachine, a

musical masque group which he had studied while preparing a course on the

history of popular music for a workers’ education project. The name was meant to

symbolize the fact that “gays were a masked people, unknown and anonymous”, and

the word, also spelled matachin or matachine , has been derived from the Arabic

of Moorish Spain, in which mutawajjihin , relates to masking oneself. Such an

opaque name is typical of the homophile movement of the time in which open

proclamation of the purposes of the group through a revealing name was regarded

as imprudent. At first the structure of the society followed that of freemasonry

with a pyramid structure, where cells at the same level would be unknown to each

other. The founders were Marxists and analyzed homosexuals in terms of an

oppressed cultural minority. The communist leanings of the organization put it

under some pressure during the anti-Communist phase in the USA. The era of

McCarthyism had begun on 9th. February, 1950 with a speech by Senator Joseph R.

McCarthy of Wisconsin, at Lincoln’s Birthday dinner of a Republican League in

Wheeling, West Virginia. Paul Coates wrote in a Los Angeles newspaper in March

1953 linking “sexual deviates” with “security risks” who were banding together

to wield “tremendous political power”. The Mattachine Society was restructured,

with a more transparent organization, and its leadership replaced. It also

changed its aims to the assimilation of homosexuals into general society, which

reflected its rejection of the notion of a homosexual minority. However the

Society declined, and at its convention in May 1954 only forty-two members

attended. The Mattachine Society produced the monthly periodical ONE Magazine ,

starting in January 1953 and eventually achieving a circulation of 5000 copies.

The regular publication of the magazine ceased in 1968, but its publisher, ONE

Inc., still exists. In January, 1955 the San Francisco branch of the Mattachine

Society began a more scholarly journal, Mattachine Review , which lasted for ten

years. The periodicals reached previously isolated individuals and helped

Mattachine to become better known nationally. Chapters functioned in a number of

USA cities through the 1960s. However, they failed to adapt to the radical

militantism after the Stonewall Rebellion and faded away.