регистрация / вход

The Life

& Philosophy Of Friedrich Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper The Life & Philosophy of Friedrich NietzschePhilosophy Class EssayBorn: 1844. Rocken, GermanyDied: 1900. Weimar, GermanyMajor Works: The Gay Science (1882),Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883-1885),Beyond Good & Evil (1886),On the Genealogy of Morals (1887),MAJOR IDEAS Self deception is a particularly destructive characteristic of West Culture.

& Philosophy Of Friedrich Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper

The Life & Philosophy of Friedrich NietzschePhilosophy Class EssayBorn: 1844. Rocken, GermanyDied: 1900. Weimar, GermanyMajor Works: The Gay Science (1882),Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883-1885),Beyond Good & Evil (1886),On the Genealogy of Morals (1887),MAJOR IDEAS Self deception is a particularly destructive characteristic of West Culture. Life is The Will To Power; our natural desire is to dominate and reshape the worldto fit our own preferences and assert our personal strength to the fullest degree possible. Struggle, through which individuals achieve a degree of power commensurate withtheir abilities, is the basic fact of human existence. Ideals of human equality perpetuate mediocrity — a truth that has been distorted andconcealed by modern value systems. Christian morality, which identifies goodness with meekness and servility is theprime culprit in creating a cultural climate that thwarts the drive for excellence and selfrealization God is dead; a new era of human creativity and achievement is at hand. — Great Thinkers In The Western World. By: Ian P. McGreal, 1992PREFACEMuch information is available on Mr. Friedrich Nietzsche, including many books that hewrote himself, during his philosophical career. I took this as a good sign I would find afountain of enlightened material produced by the man. I’ve had to go through a bit of myown philosophical meditations to put my own value judgements aside, and truly look for thecontributions Nietzsche gave to philosophy. Much of my understanding came only after Ihad a grasp of Neitzsche’s history; therefore, I encourage you to read-up on his historybefore diving into his philosophy (see Appendix I). The modern Westerner might disagreewith every aspect of his philosophy, but there are many things one must unfortunatelyadmit are true (only if you put your morality aside). So, from here, I will present hiscontributions to philosophy, and do my best to delete my own opinions, other than to saythat he was not the chosen topic of this paper out of any admiration. THE PHILOSOPHY OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHESometimes philosophy is called “timeless,” implying that it’s lessons are of value to anygeneration. This may be hard to see in Nietzsche’s work; but, we are assured that it wasappropriate thought for his time. However, even Nietzsche’s critics admit that his wordshold an undeniable truth, as hard as it is to accept. Perhaps this is why his work is timeless,and has survived 150 years in print. Christianity”God is Dead!” announced Zarathustra (better known as Zoroaster), in Neitzsche’sproudest book, Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883-1885). Unlike many philosophers, Nietzschenever tried to prove or disprove the existence of God, just that belief in God can createsickness; and to convince that highest achievements in human life depend on elimination ofGod. Whether God existed had no relevance in his goal. Proclamation of the death ofGod was a fundamental ingredient in the revaluation of values Nietzsche advocated. “Nothing has done more than Christianity to entrench the morality of mediocrity inhuman consciousness.” “Christian love extols qualities of weakness; it causes guilt. Charity is just teachinghatred and revenge directed toward nobility.” “Belief in God is a tool to bring submission to the individual of noble character.”– F. Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Hero MoralityNietzsche had an ideal world in mind, with an ideal government and an ideal God: the”Overman” or “Superman.” These Gods were a product of natural selection, or socialDarwinism. He felt, very strongly, that any kind of moral limitations upon man would onlystand in the way of The Overman. “The Will To Power,” his strongest teaching, meant thatThe Overman should and would do anything possible to gain power, control and strength. If one showed the smallest bit of weakness or morality, he would be killed by the strongerOverman, and taken over. Thus, the advancement of The Master Race (Nietzsche’s”Master Race” will be discussed later). “Not mankind, but superman is the goal. The very last thing a sensible man wouldundertake would be to improve mankind: mankind does not improve, it doesn’t even exist — it is an abstraction.” “… his superman as the individual rising precariously out of the mire of massmediocrity, and owing his existence more to deliberate breeding and careful nurture than tothe hazards of natural selection.”Master RaceNietzsche is often referred to as a pre-Nazi thinker, by his idealism of The Master Race. Hewas, in fact, a prime influence on the writing of Hitler’s highest men, and quoted in Hitler’sspeeches. But, his writings were mostly taken out of context, because he was very openabout his distaste for “those anti-semites.” If one is able to come from a more intelligentplace, regarding the breeding of best-fit humans, Nietzsche was far beyond Hitler. Nietzsche understood the necessity for variation in a population, and especially was able toappreciate the contributions of other races and cultures. His ideal society would be a racethat included select bits from many races/cultures. The only culture that he seemed to havea special appreciation for were the Polish. He wrote, “The Poles, I consider the most giftedand gallant among Slavic people…” Still, he wrote about his value for the Jews, as responseto the growing anti-semite culture in Germany during his time: “The whole problem of the Jews exists only in nation states, for here their energy

and higher intelligence, their accumulated capital of spirit and will, gathered from generationto generation though a long schooling in suffering, must become so preponderant as toarouse mass envy and hatred. In almost all contemporary nations, therefore — in directproportion to the degree which they act up nationalistically — the literary obscenity ofleading the Jews to slaughter as scapegoats of every conceivable public and internalmisfortune is spreading. As soon as it is no longer a matter of preserving nations, but ofproducing the strongest possible Euro-Mixed race, the Jew is just as useful and desirable asingredient as any other national remnant.”War MentalityNietzsche had an incredible infatuation with evil and violence. He did so much to find eviland cruelty in the world, that he seemed to have a sadistic pleasure in celebrating it; “man isthe cruelest animal,” he states in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In his book, Beyond Good andEvil, he really aims at changing the reader’s opinion as to what is good and what is evil, butprofesses, except at moments, to be raising what is “evil” and decrying what is “good.” It isnecessary for higher men to make war upon the masses, and resist the democratictendencies of the age, for in all directions mediocre people are joining hands to makethemselves masters. “Everything that pampers, that softens, and that brings the ‘people’ or’woman’ to the front, operates in favor of universal suffrage — that is to say, the dominionof ‘inferior’ men.”Women & The FamilyThis brings us to Nietzsche’s view of women. At this point, I believe it’s important to noteNietzsche’s experience with women, because his writings about them seemed to beginclosely after being rejected by the only woman he admitted to love. She rejected him as heasked her hand in marriage. “Men shall be trained for war and woman for the recreation of the warrior. All elseis folly.” “The patriotic member of a militant society will look upon bravery and strength asthe highest virtues of a man; upon obedience as the highest virtue of the citizen; and uponsilent submission to multiple motherhood as the highest virtue of woman.” “Thou goest to woman? Do not forget thy whip.”From Nietzsche’s experience with women, as author Betrand Russell said, “Nine out of tenwomen would get the whip away from him, and he knew it, so he kept away from women,and soothed his wounded vanity with unkind remarks.” Many of his comments towardwomen reflected what a lonely and unloved person he was. In some poems he wrote afterhis prospective wife left him, he wrote this lonely line: “I could sing a song, and I will sing it,although I am alone in an empty house and must sing it to mine own ears.” So, he addedappropriately to his beliefs the following:”How absurd it is, after all, to let higher individuals marry for love — heroes withservant girls and geniuses with seamstresses! When a man is in love he should not bepermitted to make decisions affecting his entire life. We should declare invalid the vows oflovers and should make love a legal impediment to marriage.”The AristocracyNietzsche loved his aristocratic anarchism, and had such a hate for democracy, that itconsumes nearly every bit of his philosophy. His ideal society was divided into three classes:producers (farmers, merchants, business men), officials (soldiers and government), andrulers. The latter would rule, but they would not officiate in government; the actualgovernment is a menial task. The rulers would be philosopher-statesmen rather than office-holders. Their power will rest on the control of credit and the army; but they would livemore like the proud-soldier than like the financier. Nietzsche believed that some people were inherently more important than others; theirhappiness or unhappiness counted for more than the happiness of average people. Hedismissed John Stuart Mill as a “blockhead” for the presupposition that everyone was equal. He wrote about Mill:”I abhor the man’s vulgarity when he says “what is right for one man is right foranother. Such principals wild fain establish the whole of human traffic upon mutualservices, so every action would appear to be a cash payment for something done to us. Thehypothesis here is ignoble to the last degree; it is taken for granted that there is some sort ofequivalence in value between my actions and thine.”Nietzsche, as I said before, hated democracy, but he recognized Christianity as a greater risk. Perhaps this was because people are always more loyal to their god, than their government. He felt that democracy began with Christianity: “…holy epileptics like saint Paul, who hadno honesty. The new testament is the gospel of a completely ignoble species of man. Christianity is the most fatal and seductive lie that ever existed.” So, before stripping peopleof their choice and equality, their God had to be taken first, then the government. “Consequently, the road to the superman must lie through aristocracy. Democracy — this manner for counting noses — must be eradicated before it is too late. The first stephere is the destruction of Christianity so far as all higher men are concerned.”ConclusionAs Will Durant stated Nietzsche’s faults so eloquently, “we can see him suffering at everyline, and we must love him even where we question him,” I couldn’t agree more. I alwaysask the supremacist the question, “why do you support a supremacist government thatwould probably reject you into it’s lower class?” I have no doubt, that if Nietzsche lived inhis ideal society, he would have no honor, as he misses every requirement, being a sicklyman who was rejected from the army, and lacking the strength to compete with his own”superman.”——————————————————————————–

ОТКРЫТЬ САМ ДОКУМЕНТ В НОВОМ ОКНЕ

ДОБАВИТЬ КОММЕНТАРИЙ  [можно без регистрации]

Ваше имя:

Комментарий

Другие видео на эту тему