VI.CONCLUSION
The intentions and ideals behind diplomatic immunity center on the protection of diplomats for the development and endurance of international relations. Importantly, most diplomats and their countries uphold the laws of the United Nations Vienna Conventions and their succeeding acts. U.S. Code 254 under title 22 illustrates such compliance, ?Any action or proceeding brought against an individual who is entitled to immunity with respect to such action or proceeding under the Vienna Convention?, or any other laws extending diplomatic privileges and immunities, shall be dismissed.? Nevertheless, abuses of diplomatic immunity disrupt national and international order. Misuses of diplomatic immunity and privileges contradict and undermine the purposes of diplomacy. As diplomats promise to create peace and establish friendly relations with other countries, an allegiance is made concurrently to uphold the laws of the land ? the land wherever their mission resides and their foot trods.
APPENDICES
A.Comparative Survey of Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic and Consular Missions
B.General Assembly Resolution 49/49
C.U.S. Code of Service Title 22, Ch. 38, 2728
D.U.S. Code of Service Title 22, Ch. 6, 254d
VII.BIBLIOGRAPHY
?And We Are the Law.? The Economist (US). 18 Apr. 1998: 27.
?Bad to Worse.? US News and World Report. 20 Jan 1997: 14.
Bradley, Curtis A. ?Breard, our Dualist Constitution, and the International Conception.? Stanford Law Review 51 (1999); 529.
?Consideration of Effective Measures to Enhance the Protection, Security, and Safety of Diplomatic and Consular Missions and Representatives,? G.A. res. 49/49, 49 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 288, U.N. Doc. A/49/49 (1994).
?Fact Sheet: Diplomatic Immunity.? US Department of State Dispatch 4 (1993): 471.
Fassbender, Bardo. ?Diplomatic Immunity ? Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations ? Effect on Diplomatic Immunity on States Other Than Receiving State.? The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998): 74-78.
Forbes, Steve. ?Like It or Not.? Forbes. 25 Jan. 1999: 32.
Frum, David. ?Diplomatic Impunity.? Forbes. 26 Apr. 1993: 110
Gould, Jennifer. ?Retaliation in Moscow.? The Village Voice. 18 Mar. 1997: 27.
Jacobson, Louis. ?An Undiplomatic Journal.? National Journal 29 (1997): 1045.
Kaplan, Refet and Walden Siew. ?Immunity No Longer Means Impunity for Diplomats?? Insight on the News. 3 Feb. 1997: 42-43.
Kubalija, Jovan. ?Comparative Study of Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic and Consular Missions.? DiploEdu (1997): 4 pp. Online. Internet.Available: http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/DIPLOMACY/topics/privileges/immunity_premises.htm.
Richards, David A. ?The Tenant with Sovereign Immunity.? Real Estate Law Journal 11 (1983): 232-240.
United States Code of Service. Title 22. Foreign Relations & Intercourse. Ch. 6. Foreign Diplomatic and Consular Officers. 254d.
United States Code of Service. Title 22. Foreign Relations & Intercourse. Ch. 38 Department of State. 2728.
Whitelaw, Kevin. ?When Diplomats Break the Law.? US News and World Report. 20 Jan. 1997: 14.
Wu, Irene. ?Identity Crisis.? Far Eastern Economic Review. 5 May 1994: 32-34.
b3f
VII.BIBLIOGRAPHY
?And We Are the Law.? The Economist (US). 18 Apr. 1998: 27.
?Bad to Worse.? US News and World Report. 20 Jan 1997: 14.
Bradley, Curtis A. ?Breard, our Dualist Constitution, and the International Conception.? Stanford Law Review 51 (1999); 529.
?Consideration of Effective Measures to Enhance the Protection, Security, and Safety of Diplomatic and Consular Missions and Representatives,? G.A. res. 49/49, 49 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 288, U.N. Doc. A/49/49 (1994).
?Fact Sheet: Diplomatic Immunity.? US Department of State Dispatch 4 (1993): 471.
Fassbender, Bardo. ?Diplomatic Immunity ? Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations ? Effect on Diplomatic Immunity on States Other Than Receiving State.? The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998): 74-78.
Forbes, Steve. ?Like It or Not.? Forbes. 25 Jan. 1999: 32.
Frum, David. ?Diplomatic Impunity.? Forbes. 26 Apr. 1993: 110
Gould, Jennifer. ?Retaliation in Moscow.? The Village Voice. 18 Mar. 1997: 27.
Jacobson, Louis. ?An Undiplomatic Journal.? National Journal 29 (1997): 1045.
Kaplan, Refet and Walden Siew. ?Immunity No Longer Means Impunity for Diplomats?? Insight on the News. 3 Feb. 1997: 42-43.
Kubalija, Jovan. ?Comparative Study of Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic and Consular Missions.? DiploEdu (1997): 4 pp. Online. Internet.Available: http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/DIPLOMACY/topics/privileges/immunity_premises.htm.
Richards, David A. ?The Tenant with Sovereign Immunity.? Real Estate Law Journal 11 (1983): 232-240.
United States Code of Service. Title 22. Foreign Relations & Intercourse. Ch. 6. Foreign Diplomatic and Consular Officers. 254d.
United States Code of Service. Title 22. Foreign Relations & Intercourse. Ch. 38 Department of State. 2728.
Whitelaw, Kevin. ?When Diplomats Break the Law.? US News and World Report. 20 Jan. 1997: 14.
Wu, Irene. ?Identity Crisis.? Far Eastern Economic Review. 5 May 1994: 32-34.